MARC Record from marc_columbia

LEADER: 02192mam a2200349 a 4500
001 1984103
005 20220609043105.0
008 970331s1996 ne a b 000 0 eng d
020 $a9051703783
035 $a(OCoLC)ocm36651053
035 $9AMK3475CU
035 $a(NNC)1984103
035 $a1984103
040 $aEYW$cEYW$dNNC$dOrLoB-B
100 1 $aSnijders, Chris.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no97026476
245 10 $aTrust and commitments /$cChris Snijders.
260 $aAmsterdam :$bThesis Publishers,$c1996.
300 $axv, 257 pages :$billustrations ;$c23 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
490 1 $aICS dissertatie-reeks
500 $a"ICS/RUG/UU/KUN"--Cover.
500 $aSummary in Dutch.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [229]-249).
505 00 $g1.$tIntroduction --$g2.$tTrust: theory --$g3.$tData collection --$g4.$tTrust: analyses --$g5.$tCommitments: theory --$g6.$tCommitments: analyses --$g7.$tSummary and conclusion --$gA.$tInstruction texts --$gB.$tSome technicalities --$gC.$tThe Nurnberg data.
520 $aWhen and why do we trust other people? Do we trust someone only if abused trust has insignificant consequences? Do we base the decision to trust someone on that person's looks? Are males more likely to trust other people than females? Trust facilitates both social and economic life as it eases the burden of unspecified reciprocation. However, trust is risky: unjustified trust might lead to undesirable consequences.
520 8 $aThis book addressed the way in which people balance the costs and benefits of trusting and the way in which commitments may enhance trust. Using a simple game as a metaphor for trust, theoretical predictions are derived and confronted with the behavior of people in an experimental setting.
650 0 $aTrust.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85138261
650 0 $aDilemma.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85038010
650 0 $aGame theory.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85052941
830 0 $aICS dissertatie-reeks.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n93016130
852 00 $boff,psy$hBF575.T7$iS6 1996g