It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from marc_columbia

Record ID marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-005.mrc:305642313:3250
Source marc_columbia
Download Link /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-005.mrc:305642313:3250?format=raw

LEADER: 03250cam a2200469 a 4500
001 2239201
005 20220616000500.0
008 970618s1998 pau b 000 0 eng
010 $a 97026885
020 $a1566395976 (cloth : alk. paper)
020 $a1566395984 (paper : alk. paper)
035 $a(OCoLC)37211349
035 $a(OCoLC)ocm37211349
035 $9ANX2709CU
035 $a(NNC)2239201
035 $a2239201
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dDLC$dNNC-M$dOrLoB-B
050 00 $aRC963.6.W65$bM47 1998
082 00 $a616.9/803*/082$221
100 1 $aMessing, Karen.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n97008705
245 10 $aOne-eyed science :$boccupational health and women workers /$cKaren Messing ; foreword by Jeanne Mager Stellman.
260 $aPhiladelphia :$bTemple University Press,$c1998.
300 $axx, 244 pages ;$c22 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
490 1 $aLabor and social change
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 00 $tForeword /$rJeanne Mager Stellman --$g1.$tWomen Workers and Their Working Conditions --$g2.$tIs There a Women's Occupational Health Problem? --$g3.$tAre Women Biologically Fit for Jobs? Are Jobs Fit for Women? --$g4.$tWho Are Scientists? --$g5.$t"Rigor": The Scientific Basis for Funding --$g6.$tConstructing Scientific Knowledge --$g7.$tMusculoskeletal Problems --$g8.$tOffice Work and Health --$g9.$tEmotional Stressors in Women's Occupations --$g10.$tReproductive Hazards --$g11.$tScience and Real Life --$g12.$tChanging Science for Women Workers.
520 $aAfter decades of research by the author and her colleagues into what women do in positions such as bank teller, secretary, waitress, nurse, factory worker, and poultry processor, Karen Messing is astonished to find that for many policymakers, researchers, and activists, the topic of women's occupational health doesn't exist.
520 8 $aResponding to the tough question, why are scientists so unresponsive to the needs of women workers, Messing describes long-standing difficulties in gaining attention for the occupational health of women, ranging from the structure of the grant process and the conferences crucial to the professional life of researchers to the basic assumptions of scientific practice.
520 8 $aMessing laments the separation of even most feminist health researchers from workplace concerns and asserts that it is time to develop a science that can prevent women workers' pain and suffering.
650 0 $aWomen$xEmployment$xHealth aspects.
650 0 $aOccupational diseases$xSex factors.
650 0 $aSex discrimination against women.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85120595
650 0 $aSexism in medicine.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85120685
650 2 $aWomen.$0https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D014930
650 2 $aEmployment.$0https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D004651
650 2 $aOccupational Diseases.$0https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D009784
650 2 $aSex Factors.$0https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D012737
830 0 $aLabor and social change.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n84738573
852 00 $bbar$hRC963.6.W65$iM47 1998
852 00 $bleh$hRC963.6.W65$iM47 1998