Record ID | marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-005.mrc:356107746:2688 |
Source | marc_columbia |
Download Link | /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-005.mrc:356107746:2688?format=raw |
LEADER: 02688mam a2200361 a 4500
001 2277034
005 20220616010335.0
008 980727s1999 nyua b 001 0 eng
010 $a 98038454
020 $a0312218435 (cloth)
035 $a(OCoLC)ocm39640056
035 $9APC2761CU
035 $a2277034
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dNNC$dOrLoB-B
043 $aae-----$aaz-----
050 00 $aHC460.5$b.M35 1999
082 00 $a338.95$221
100 1 $aMascarenhas, R. C.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n82135336
245 10 $aComparative political economy of East and South Asia :$ba critique of development policy and management /$cR.C. Mascarenhas.
260 $aNew York :$bSt. Martin's Press,$c1999.
263 $a9901
300 $aix, 220 pages :$billustrations ;$c22 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 194-214) and index.
505 00 $gCh. 1.$tDevelopment: a Comparative Study --$gCh. 2.$tDevelopment: Problems and Constraints --$gCh. 3.$tDevelopment: Changing Objectives --$gCh. 4.$tState and Market: Alternatives to Development --$gCh. 5.$tComparative Development: the Two Asias --$gCh. 6.$tDevelopment Policies: Analysis and Implementation --$gCh. 7.$tDeveloping Capability for Managing Development --$gCh. 8.$tTechnology and Industrialization: a Strategy for Development --$gCh. 9.$tPublic Enterprise and Development --$gCh. 10.$tStrategies for the Development and Management of Agriculture --$gCh. 11.$tConclusion.
520 $aThe author asks why East Asian governments were able to adopt appropriate types of state intervention while countries in South Asia were not? Based on evidence of studies the book emphasises the capacity of governments to govern and that means developing political and administrative institutions capable of formulating and implementing development policies. As a critique of development policy and management, this study looks at historical and contextual factors and political and administrative systems.
520 8 $aThe success of East Asian countries is attributed to the distinctive institutional characteristics identified with the strong state, in contrast to the soft state characteristic of South Asia.
651 0 $aEast Asia$xEconomic policy.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2008102553
651 0 $aEast Asia$xEconomic conditions.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85040528
651 0 $aSouth Asia$xEconomic policy.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2008117021
651 0 $aSouth Asia$xEconomic conditions.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2008117019
852 00 $bleh$hHC460.5$i.M35 1999