MARC Record from marc_columbia

LEADER: 03026mam a2200313 a 4500
001 3233933
005 20221020013418.0
008 020303t20012001inu b 000 0 eng d
020 $a1558131302
035 $a(OCoLC)ocm49229276
035 $9AUK6360CU
035 $a3233933
040 $aSLL$cSLL$dOrLoB-B
043 $an-us---
050 4 $aKF228.U5$bR49 2001
100 1 $aReynolds, Alan.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n83178887
245 14 $aThe Microsoft antitrust appeal :$bJudge Jackson's "findings of fact" revisited /$cAlan Reynolds.
260 $aWestfield, IN :$bHudson Institute,$c[2001], ©2001.
300 $a135 pages ;$c23 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 127-131).
505 00 $tJudge Jackson's "Findings of Fact" Revisited --$tFindings or Facts? --$tTwo Conflicting Theories --$tJudicial Doubts About the DOJ Middleware Muddle --$tThe Applications Barrier to Clear Thinking --$tVolume Discounts, Not Unprofitable Favoritism --$tNetscape's Browser Was Never Magical --$tJudge Jackson Rebuts the Alleged Java Threat --$tLegends About Navigator for Windows 95 --$tAll Browsers Are Internet Platforms --$tMac Is No Competition, but QuickTime Is? --$tWho Abandoned What? --$tA Free and Costly Browser --$tThis Is Consumer Harm? --$tSabotaging Internet Integration and Meaningless Courtroom Theatrics --$tAOL Wants to Keep Subscribers at Home --$tConsumers (and AOL) Picked the Wrong Browser --$tAbout Hudson Institute.
520 1 $a"A judge's legal ruling can be a complex interaction between facts and laws. However, if a judge bases his ruling on erroneous technological theories, speculation, and forecasts, the final decision will be a wasteland of legal mumbo-jumbo, incomprehensible to both lawyers and critics. This is what happened when Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson decided the Microsoft antirust case, ordering the division of the software giant into two separate companies.".
520 8 $a"In a new study of the Microsoft antirust case, Hudson Institute economist Alan Reynolds examines, point for point, every Finding of Fact on which Judge Jackson based his conclusions. He critiques the accuracy, consistency, and relevance of nearly all of the judge's 412 Facts, finding that half of the facts went unmentioned in the judge's legal conclusions. This leads Reynolds to the verdict that the case is "literally baseless."".
520 8 $a"The book also provides detailed reporting of key meetings and memos from Microsoft, Netscape, and many more top players involved in the trial or the computer software and hardware industries. Reynolds brings the reader deep into the world of legal questions surrounding computers and software, and gives deep insights into this increasingly important industry."--BOOK JACKET.
610 20 $aMicrosoft Corporation$xTrials, litigation, etc.
710 2 $aHudson Institute.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79032831
852 00 $bleh$hKF228.U5$iR49 2001g