It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from marc_columbia

Record ID marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-007.mrc:428494009:3719
Source marc_columbia
Download Link /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-007.mrc:428494009:3719?format=raw

LEADER: 03719mam a2200481 a 4500
001 3421364
005 20221020071310.0
008 010328s2001 mau b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2001024463
015 $aGBA1-68730
020 $a0674006291 (alk. paper)
035 $a(OCoLC)ocm46785256
035 $9AVP0671CU
035 $a3421364
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dC#P$dUKM$dDDQ$dLVB$dOrLoB-B
042 $apcc
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aKF2979$b.M37 2001
082 00 $a346.7304/8$221
100 1 $aMcSherry, Corynne,$d1969-$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2001103421
245 10 $aWho owns academic work? :$bbattling for control of intellectual property /$cCorynne McSherry.
260 $aCambridge, Mass. :$bHarvard University Press,$c2001.
300 $a275 pages ;$c25 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [251]-266) and index.
505 00 $g1.$tBuilding an Epistemic Regime -- $g2.$tAn Uncommon Controversy -- $g3.$t"University Lectures Are Sui Generis" -- $g4.$tMetes and Bounds -- $g5.$tTelling Tales Out of School.
520 1 $a"Who owns academic work? This question is provoking political and legal battles, fought on uncertain terrain, for ever-higher stakes. The posting of faculty lecture notes on commercial websites is being hotly debated in multiple forums, even as faculty and university administrators square off in a battle for professorial copyright. In courtrooms throughout the country, universities find themselves embroiled in intricate and expensive patent litigation.
520 8 $aMeanwhile, junior researchers are appearing in those same courtrooms, using intellectual property rules to challenge traditional academic hierarchies. All but forgotten in these ownership disputes is a more fundamental question: Should academic work be owned at all? Once characterized as a kind of gift, academic work - and academic freedom - are now being reframed as private intellectual property.".
520 8 $a"Drawing on legal, historical, and qualitative research, Corynne McSherry explores the propertization of academic work and shows how that process is shaking the foundation of the university, the professoriate, and intellectual property law. The modern university's reason for being is inextricably tied to that of the intellectual property system.
520 8 $aThe rush of universities and scholars to defend their knowledge as property dangerously undercuts a working covenant that has sustained academic life - and intellectual property law - for a century and a half. As the value structure of the research university is replaced by the inequalities of the free market, academics risk losing a language for talking about knowledge as anything other than property.
520 8 $aMcSherry has written a book that ought to deeply trouble everyone who cares about the academy."--BOOK JACKET.
650 0 $aIntellectual property$zUnited States.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2008104752
650 0 $aCopyright$zUnited States.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85032489
650 0 $aPublic domain (Copyright law)$zUnited States.
650 0 $aScholarly publishing$zUnited States.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2010111995
650 0 $aAcademic freedom$zUnited States.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2007100497
650 6 $aPropriété intellectuelle$zÉtats-Unis.
650 6 $aDroit d'auteur$zÉtats-Unis.
650 6 $aDroit d'auteur$xDomaine public$zÉtats-Unis.
650 6 $aÉdition savante$zÉtats-Unis.
650 6 $aLiberté de l'enseignement$zÉtats-Unis.
852 00 $boff,glx$hKF2979$i.M37 2001