MARC Record from marc_columbia

LEADER: 03371cam a22004334a 4500
001 4846787
005 20221109191433.0
008 040517t20042004nyua b s001 0 eng
010 $a 2004041706
016 7 $a101218279$2DNLM
020 $a0791460789 (pbk. : alk. paper)
020 $a0791460770 (alk. paper)
035 $a(OCoLC)ocm54081760
035 $a(NNC)4846787
035 $a4846787
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dNLM$dYBM$dOrLoB-B
042 $apcc
050 00 $aBF175.5.S48$bR34 2004
060 00 $a2004 F-981
060 10 $aBF 692$bR143L 2004
082 00 $a155.3$222
100 1 $aRagland-Sullivan, Ellie,$d1941-$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n84032527
245 14 $aThe logic of sexuation :$bfrom Aristotle to Lacan /$cEllie Ragland.
260 $aAlbany :$bState University of New York Press,$c[2004], ©2004.
300 $axi, 216 pages :$billustrations ;$c23 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
490 1 $aSUNY series in psychoanalysis and culture
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 193-208) and index.
505 00 $g1.$t"On the signification of the phallus" (1958) : according to Lacan --$g2.$tFreud's "female sexuality" (1931) and "femininity" (1932) : Oedipus revisited via the Lacanian pre-Oedipus --$g3.$tFeminine sexuality, or why the sexual difference makes all the difference : Lacan's "for a congress on feminine sexuality" (1958) --$g4.$tA rereading of Freud's 1925 essay : "some psychical consequences of the anatomical distinction between the sexes" through Lacan's theory of sexuation --$g5.$tThe place of the mother in Lacanian analysis : Lacan's theory of the object, or castration rethought.
520 1 $a"In The Logic of Sexuation, Ellie Ragland offers a detailed account of Jacques Lacan's theories of gender, sexuality, and sexual difference. Exploring Lacan's rereading (via Aristotle) of Freud's major essays on feminine sexuality, Ragland demonstrates that Lacanian theory challenges essentialist notions of gender more effectively than do current debates in gender studies, which are typically enmeshed in an imaginary impasse of one sex versus or interchanged with the other. Although much American feminist thought on Lacan has portrayed him as anti-Woman, Ragland argues that Lacan was, in fact, pro-Woman, as he felt that no advances in analytic cure, or in thinking itself, could evolve except by embracing the feminine logic of the "not all," with its particular modes of jouissance. Ragland also aims to make sense of the terms phallus, castration, sexuation, the object a, jouissance, and so on, in relation to the question of sexual difference. In doing so, she uncovers Lacan's theory that the learning of sexual difference is what makes it possible to think dialectically at all."--BOOK JACKET.
650 0 $aSex (Psychology)$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85120562
600 10 $aLacan, Jacques,$d1901-1981.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n80022983
600 12 $aLacan, Jacques,$d1901-
650 12 $aSexuality$xpsychology.$0https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D019529Q000523
650 22 $aGender Identity.$0https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D005783
830 0 $aSUNY series in psychoanalysis and culture.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n92082125
852 00 $bglx$hBF175.5.S48$iR34 2004
852 00 $bbar$hBF175.5.S48$iR34 2004