| Record ID | marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-010.mrc:397742641:1459 |
| Source | marc_columbia |
| Download Link | /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-010.mrc:397742641:1459?format=raw |
LEADER: 01459cam a2200337ua 4500
001 4935787
005 20221109172034.0
008 830309s1711 enk b 000 0 eng d
035 $a(OCoLC)16013920
035 $a(OCoLC)ocm16013920
035 $a(CStRLIN)DCFG83-B235
035 $a(NNC)4935787
035 $a4935787
040 $aDFo$cDFo
099 $a699$aD4
100 1 $aCollins, Anthony,$d1676-1729.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n50026834
245 13 $aAn answer to Mr. Clark's Third defence of his letter to Mr. Dodwell.
250 $aThe second edition, corrected.
260 $aLondon :$bPrinted by J. Darby ...,$c1711.
300 $a80 p. ;$c20 cm (8vo)
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
500 $aAnonymous. By Anthony Collins.
500 $aAnswers Samuel Clarke's "Third defense of an argument made use of in a Letter to Mr Dodwel," which was part of the controversy concerning the immortality of the soul begun by Dodwell's "Epistolary discourse."
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references.
600 10 $aClarke, Samuel,$d1675-1729.$tThird defense of an argument made use of in a Letter to Mr Dodwel.
600 10 $aDodwell, Henry,$d1641-1711.$tEpistolary discourse.
650 0 $aImmortality.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85064531
740 3 $aAn answer to Mr. Clark's Third defence.
752 $aGreat Britain$bEngland$dLondon.$2naf
852 8 $buts,gil$h699$iD4