| Record ID | marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-011.mrc:67459974:2874 |
| Source | marc_columbia |
| Download Link | /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-011.mrc:67459974:2874?format=raw |
LEADER: 02874pam a22003614a 4500
001 5079332
005 20221109214155.0
008 040512s2005 nyua b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2004049005
020 $a1403965714
035 $a(OCoLC)ocm55511318
035 $a(NNC)5079332
035 $a5079332
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dYDX$dOrLoB-B
042 $apcc
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aHN90.P8$bA5 2005
082 00 $a303.3/8/0973$222
245 00 $aAmbivalence and the structure of political opinion /$cedited by Stephen C. Craig and Michael D. Martinez.
250 $a1st ed.
260 $aNew York :$bPalgrave Macmillan,$c2005.
300 $axvi, 196 pages :$billustrations ;$c22 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [173]-191) and index.
505 00 $g1.$tPros and cons : ambivalence and public opinion /$rMichael D. Martinez, Stephen C. Craig and James G. Kant -- $g2.$tAmbivalence as internal conflict /$rBethany Albertson, John Brehm and R. Michael Alvarez -- $g3.$tAmbivalence and accessibility : the consequences of accessible ambivalence /$rIan R. Newby-Clark, Ian McGregor and Mark P. Zanna -- $g4.$tAmbivalence and response instability : a panel study /$rStephen C. Craig, Michael D. Martinez and James G. Kane -- $g5.$tMeta-psychological versus operative measures of ambivalence : differentiating the consequences of perceived intra-psychic conflict and real intra-psychic conflict /$rAllyson L. Holbrook and Jon A. Krosnick -- $g6.$tAmbivalence toward American political institutions : sources and consequences /$rKathleen M. McGraw and Brandon Bartels -- $g7.$tPatriotic to the core? : American ambivalence about America /$rJack Citrin and Samantha Luks -- $g8.$tIs it really ambivalence? : public opinion toward government spending /$rWilliam G. Jacoby.
520 1 $a"Essays by a distinguished group of political scientists and social psychologists provide a conceptual framework for understanding how ambivalence is currently understood and measured, as well as its relevance to the public's beliefs about our political institutions and national identity. The theoretical insights, methodological innovations, and empirical analyses will add substantially to our knowledge about the nature of ambivalence in particular, and the structure and evolution of political attitudes in general."--BOOK JACKET.
650 0 $aPublic opinion$zUnited States.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2010105279
650 0 $aAmbivalence.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85004151
651 0 $aUnited States$xPolitics and government$xPublic opinion.
700 1 $aCraig, Stephen C.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n93038136
700 1 $aMartinez, Michael D.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2004096391
852 00 $bleh$hHN90.P8$iA5 2005