It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from marc_columbia

Record ID marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-013.mrc:87397392:2910
Source marc_columbia
Download Link /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-013.mrc:87397392:2910?format=raw

LEADER: 02910cam a2200397 a 4500
001 6105755
005 20221121234944.0
008 070307t20072007onc b 000 d eng
016 $a20069040745
020 $a1551112108 :$c$15.95
020 $a9781551112107 :$c$15.95
029 0 $aNLC$b20069040745
035 $a(OCoLC)ocm70676091
035 $a(OrLoB)R0630230
035 $a(OCoLC)70676091
035 $a(NNC)6105755
035 $a6105755
040 $aNLC$beng$cNLC$dBAKER$dC#P$dOrLoB-B
050 4 $aPR2664.A2$bK44 2007
055 0 $aPR2664 A2$bK43 2007
082 0 $a822/.3$222
100 1 $aMarlowe, Christopher,$d1564-1593.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n78088956
245 10 $aDoctor Faustus :$ba 1604-version edition /$cChristopher Marlowe ; edited by Michael Keefer.
250 $a2nd ed.
260 $aPeterborough, Ont. ;$aOrchard Park, NY :$bBroadview,$c[2007], ©2007.
300 $a314 pages ;$c22 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
490 1 $aBroadview editions
500 $aPrevious ed. published in 1991 under title: Christopher Marlowe's Doctor Faustus.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 292-314).
520 1 $a"Doctor Faustus is a classic; its imaginative boldness and vertiginous ironies have fascinated readers and playgoers alike. But the fact that this play exists in two early versions, printed in 1604 and 1616, has posed formidable problems for critics. How much of either version was written by Marlowe, and which is the more authentic? Is the play orthodox or radically interrogative?" "Michael Keefer's early work helped to establish the current consensus that the 1604 version best preserves Doctor Faustus's original form, and that the 1616 text was censored and revised; the first Broadview edition, praised for its lucid introduction and scholarship, was the first to restore two displaced scenes to their correct place. All competing editions presume that the 1604 text was printed from authorial manuscript, and that the 1616 text is of little substantive value. But in 2006 Keefer's fresh analysis of the evidence showed that the 1604 quarto's Marlovian scenes were printed from a corrupted manuscript, and that the 1616 quarto (though indeed censored and revised) preserves some readings earlier than those of the 1604 text." "This revised and updated Broadview edition offers the best available text of Doctor Faustus. Keefer's critical introduction reconstructs the ideological contexts that shaped and deformed the play, and the text is accompanied by textual and explanatory notes and excerpts from sources."--BOOK JACKET.
700 1 $aKeefer, Michael H.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n97089284
730 0 $aChristopher Marlowe's Doctor Faustus.
830 0 $aBroadview editions.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2004069321
852 00 $bglx$hPR2664.A2$iK44 2007