| Record ID | marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-014.mrc:175542497:2453 |
| Source | marc_columbia |
| Download Link | /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-014.mrc:175542497:2453?format=raw |
LEADER: 02453cam a22003254a 4500
001 6993124
005 20221130201515.0
008 080618t20082008ilu b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2008027129
020 $a9780812696585 (trade paper : alk. paper)
020 $a0812696581 (trade paper : alk. paper)
024 $a40016273426
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn227918828
035 $a(OCoLC)227918828
035 $a(NNC)6993124
035 $a6993124
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dBTCTA$dBAKER$dYDXCP$dC#P$dOrLoB-B
050 00 $aBJ1458.3$b.T46 2008
082 00 $a170/.42$222
100 1 $aThomson, Judith Jarvis.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n85335352
245 10 $aNormativity /$cJudith Jarvis Thomson.
260 $aChicago, Ill. :$bOpen Court,$c[2008], ©2008.
300 $aix, 271 pages ;$c23 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 00 $gI.$tGoodness -- $gII.$tGoodness Properties -- $gIII.$tExpressivism -- $gIV.$tBetterness Relations -- $gV.$tVirtue/Kind Properties -- $gVI.$tCorrectness Properties (Acts) -- $gVII.$tCorrectness Properties (Mental States) -- $gVIII.$tReasons-For (Mental States) -- $gIX.$tReasons-For (Acts) -- $gX.$tOn Some Views about "Ought": Relativism, Dilemmas, Means-Ends -- $gXI.$tOn Some Views about "Ought": Belief, Outcomes, Epistemic Ought -- $gXII.$tDirectives -- $gAddendum 1.$t"Red" and "Good" -- $gAddendum 2.$tCorrectness -- $gAddendum 3.$tReasons -- $gAddendum 4.$tReasoning.
520 1 $a"Judith Jarvis Thomson's Normativity is a study of normative thought, She brings out that normative thought is not restricted to moral thought, Normative Judgments divide into two sub-kinds, the evaluative and the directive; but the sub-kinds are larger than is commonly appreciated." "Thomson shows that given the extensiveness of the two sub-kinds of normative judgment, our everyday thinking is rich in normativity, and moreover, that there is no gap between normative and factual thought - our everyday thinking is rich not only in normativity, but in judgments that are factual as well as normative. The widespread suspicion of the normative is therefore in large measure due to nothing deeper than an excessively narrow conception of what counts as a normative Judgment."--BOOK JACKET.
650 0 $aNormativity (Ethics)$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh95003607
852 00 $bglx$hBJ1458.3$i.T46 2008