MARC Record from marc_columbia

LEADER: 03243cam a22003494a 4500
001 7094447
005 20221130205815.0
008 080814t20092009mau b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2008035983
020 $a9780262013048 (hc. : alk. paper)
020 $a0262013045 (hc. : alk. paper)
020 $a9780262512756 (pbk. : alk. paper)
020 $a0262512750 (pbk. : alk. paper)
024 $a40016486618
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn243960521
035 $a(OCoLC)243960521
035 $a(NNC)7094447
035 $a7094447
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dBTCTA$dYDXCP$dUKM$dC#P$dOrLoB-B
050 00 $aBD638$b.H585 2009
082 00 $a115$222
100 1 $aHoy, David Couzens.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n78056394
245 14 $aThe time of our lives :$ba critical history of temporality /$cDavid Couzens Hoy.
260 $aCambridge, Mass. :$bMIT Press,$c[2009], ©2009.
300 $axxi, 288 pages ;$c22 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [267]-275) and index.
505 00 $g1.$tIn Search of Lost Time: Kant and Heidegger -- $g2.$tThere Is No Time Like the Present! On the Now -- $g3.$tWhere Does the Time Go? On the Past -- $g4.$t"The Times They Are a-Changin'": On the Future -- $g5.$tLe temps retrouve: Time Reconciled -- $tPostscript on Method: Genealogy. Phenomenology, Critical Theory.
520 1 $a"The project of all philosophy may be to gain reconciliation with time, even if not every philosopher has dealt with time expressly. A confrontation with the passing of time and with human finitude runs through the history of philosophy as an ultimate concern. In this genealogy of the concept of temporality, David Hoy examines the emergence in a post-Kantian continental philosophy of a focus on the lived experience of the "time of our lives" rather than on the time of the universe. The purpose is to see how phenomenological and poststructuralist philosophers have tried to locate the source of temporality, how they have analyzed time's passing, and how they have depicted our relation to time once it has been - in a Proustian sense - regained." "Hoy engages with competing theoretical tactics for reconciling us to our fleeting temporality. After discussing Kant's interpretation of time and Heidegger's productive misreading of Kant, Hoy examines the work of Hegel, Husserl, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, and Nietzsche, for theories of the present; draws further lessons from Gadamer, Sartre, Bourdieu, Foucault, and Bergson about the past; and analyzes in addition philosophers Deleuze, Zizek, and Derrida on the politics of the future. Then Hoy considers four existential strategies for coping with the apparent flow of temporality, including Proust's passive and Walter Benjamin's active reconciliation through memory, Zizek's critique of poststructuralist politics, Foucault's confrontation with the temporality of power, and Deleuze's account of Aion and Chronos. The study concludes by exploring whether a dual temporalization could be what constitutes the singular "time of our lives.""--BOOK JACKET.
650 0 $aTime$xPhilosophy.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2008112898
852 00 $bglx$hBD638$i.H585 2009