| Record ID | marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-016.mrc:171605099:3685 |
| Source | marc_columbia |
| Download Link | /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-016.mrc:171605099:3685?format=raw |
LEADER: 03685cam a2200445 a 4500
001 7953406
005 20221201045850.0
008 100514s2010 nyua b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2010020576
020 $a9780521768726 (hardback)
020 $a0521768721 (hardback)
020 $a9780521125666 (pbk.)
020 $a0521125669 (pbk.)
029 1 $aAU@$b000045621304
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn632225055
035 $a(OCoLC)632225055
035 $a(NNC)7953406
035 $a7953406
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dYDX$dBWK$dCDX$dYDXCP$dOrLoB-B
042 $apcc
050 00 $aHN57$b.B88 2010
082 00 $a303.48/4$222
100 1 $aBusby, Joshua W.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2010031057
245 10 $aMoral movements and foreign policy /$cJoshua W. Busby.
260 $aNew York :$bCambridge University Press,$c2010.
300 $axiv, 327 pages :$billustrations ;$c23 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
490 1 $aCambridge studies in international relations ;$v116
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 00 $g1.$tStates of grace -- $gAppendix 1A.$tTransnational principled advocacy movements in the post-Cold War era (1990-) -- $g2.$tMovement success and state acceptance of normative commitments -- $g3.$tBono made Jesse Helms cry: Jubilee 2000 and the campaign for developing country debt relief -- $g4.$tClimate change: the hardest problem in the world -- $g5.$tFrom God's mouth: messenger effects and donor responses to HIV/AIDS -- $gAppendix 5A.$tEvaluations of actual fair share contributions to global AIDS efforts -- $gAppendix 5B.$tMission and dominant frame of various advocacy organizations -- $gAppendix 5C.$tReasons for foreign assistance -- $gAppendix 5D.$tAggregating support for foreign assistance -- $g6.$tThe search for justice and the International Criminal Court -- $gAppendix 6A.$tAdditional opinion polls on support for human rights -- $g7.$tConclusions and the future of principled advocacy.
520 $a"Why do advocacy campaigns succeed in some cases but fail in others? What conditions motivate states to accept commitments championed by principled advocacy movements? Joshua W. Busby sheds light on these core questions through an investigation of four cases - developing country debt relief, climate change, AIDS, and the International Criminal Court - in the G-7 advanced industrialized countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States). Drawing on hundreds of interviews with policy practitioners, he employs qualitative, comparative case study methods, including process-tracing and typologies, and develops a framing/gatekeepers argument, emphasizing the ways in which advocacy campaigns use rhetoric to tap into the main cultural currents in the countries where they operate. Busby argues that when values and costs potentially pull in opposing directions, values will win if domestic gatekeepers who are able to block policy change believe that the values at stake are sufficiently important"--$cProvided by publisher.
650 0 $aSocial action$vCase studies.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2010112510
650 0 $aNonprofit organizations$vCase studies.
650 0 $aPressure groups$vCase studies.
650 0 $aValues$vCase studies.
650 0 $aInternational relations$vCase studies.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2009127458
830 0 $aCambridge studies in international relations ;$v116.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n84736825
856 42 $3Cover image$uhttp://assets.cambridge.org/97805217/68726/cover/9780521768726.jpg
852 00 $bleh$hHN57$i.B88 2010