It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from marc_columbia

Record ID marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-016.mrc:20321979:2777
Source marc_columbia
Download Link /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-016.mrc:20321979:2777?format=raw

LEADER: 02777cam a22003734a 4500
001 7577164
005 20221201011855.0
008 090727t20102010njua b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2009029165
020 $a9781412810753
020 $a1412810752
024 $a40017457943
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn351324685
035 $a(OCoLC)351324685
035 $a(NNC)7577164
035 $a7577164
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dBTCTA$dYDXCP$dC#P$dOrLoB-B
050 00 $aH97$b.M555 2010
082 00 $a320.6$222
245 00 $aMind the gap :$bperspectives on policy evaluation and the social sciences /$cJos Vaessen and Frans L. Leeuw, editors.
260 $aNew Brunswick, N.J. :$bTransaction Publishers,$c[2010], ©2010.
300 $ax, 244 pages :$billustrations ;$c24 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
490 1 $aComparative policy evaluation ;$vv. 16
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 00 $gIntroduction.$tMind the gap /$rFrans L. Leeuw and Jos Vaessen -- $g1.$tUS sociology and evaluation : issues in the relationship between methodology and theory /$rNicoletta Stame -- $g2.$tEvaluation and the disciplines in development /$rRobert Picciotto -- $g3.$tEconomics and evaluation /$rSandra Speer -- $g4.$tThe intellectual underpinnings of a comprehensive body of evaluative knowledge : the case of INTEVAL /$rLisa Birch and Steve Jacob -- $g5.$tPublic management theory, evaluation, and evidence-based policy /$rRobert Schwartz -- $g6.$tInterventions as theories : closing the gap between evaluation and the disciplines? /$rJos Vaessen and Frans L. Leeuw -- $g7.$tMiddle range theory and program theory evaluation : from provenance to practice /$rRay Pawson -- $g8.$tRealistic evaluation and disciplinary knowledge : applications from the field of criminology /$rNick Tilley.
520 1 $a"Mind the Gap has a twofold aim. The first is to highlight and characterize the gap between evaluation practices and debates, and the substantive knowledge debates within the social and behavioral sciences. The second is to show why this gap is problematic for the practice of evaluation, while at the same time illustrating possible ways to build bridges. The book is centered on the value of producing useful evaluation grounded in social science theory and research."--BOOK JACKET.
650 0 $aPolicy sciences$xEvaluation.
650 0 $aSocial sciences.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85124003
700 1 $aVaessen, Jos.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2003111391
700 1 $aLeeuw, Frans L.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n93044049
830 0 $aComparative policy evaluation series ;$vv. 16.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2005012503
852 00 $bleh$hH97$i.M555 2010