Record ID | marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-018.mrc:22221601:4080 |
Source | marc_columbia |
Download Link | /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-018.mrc:22221601:4080?format=raw |
LEADER: 04080cam a2200421 a 4500
001 8599488
005 20221201062618.0
008 100913s2011 enk b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2010039189
020 $a9780521199995
020 $a0521199999
020 $a9780521186384 (pbk.)
020 $a0521186382 (pbk.)
024 $a99942372628
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn663441168
035 $a(OCoLC)663441168
035 $a(NNC)8599488
035 $a8599488
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dYDX$dUKM$dYDXCP$dBWK
042 $apcc
050 00 $aKZ6374$b.O74 2011
082 00 $a341.3$222
084 $aLAW051000$2bisacsh
100 1 $aOrford, Anne.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/nb2003039192
245 10 $aInternational authority and the responsibility to protect /$cAnne Orford.
260 $aCambridge, UK ;$aNew York :$bCambridge University Press,$c2011.
300 $aix, 235 pages ;$c23 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
500 $aMachine generated contents note: 1. Protection in the shadow of empire; 2. Practices of protection: from the parliament of man to international executive rule; 3. How to recognise lawful authority: Hobbes, Schmitt and the responsibility to protect; 4. Who decides? Who interprets?: Jurisdiction, recognition and the institutionalisation of protection; 5. The question of status and the subject of protection.
520 $a"The idea that states and the international community have a responsibility to protect populations at risk has framed internationalist debates about conflict prevention, humanitarian aid, peacekeeping and territorial administration since 2001. This book situates the responsibility to protect concept in a broad historical and jurisprudential context, demonstrating that the appeal to protection as the basis for de facto authority has emerged at times of civil war or revolution - the Protestant revolutions of early modern Europe, the bourgeois and communist revolutions of the following centuries and the revolution that is decolonisation. This analysis, from Hobbes to the UN, of the resulting attempts to ground authority on the capacity to guarantee security and protection is essential reading for all those seeking to understand, engage with, limit or critique the expansive practices of international executive action authorised by the responsibility to protect concept"--$cProvided by publisher.
520 $a"Protection in the Shadow of Empire Since the late 1950s, the United Nations and other international actors have developed and systematised a body of practices aimed at 'the maintenance of order' and 'the protection of life' in the decolonised world. These practices range from fact-finding and the provision of humanitarian assistance to peacekeeping, the management of refugee camps and territorial administration. As the UN and humanitarian organisations expanded and consolidated those practices, a new form of authority began to emerge. This book is an exploration of the ways in which those practices of governing and that form of authority have been represented. It focuses in particular upon a new basis for justifying and rationalising international rule that emerged at the beginning of the twenty-first century"--$cProvided by publisher.
505 8 $aMachine generated contents note: 1. Protection in the shadow of empire; 2. Practices of protection: from the parliament of man to international executive rule; 3. How to recognise lawful authority: Hobbes, Schmitt and the responsibility to protect; 4. Who decides? Who interprets?: Jurisdiction, recognition and the institutionalisation of protection; 5. The question of status and the subject of protection.
650 0 $aInternational police.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85067434
650 0 $aPeacekeeping forces.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh99002546
650 0 $aIntervention (International law)$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85067543
852 00 $bleh$hKZ6374$i.O74 2011