MARC Record from marc_columbia

LEADER: 04285cam a2200649 i 4500
001 12317877
005 20170221150837.0
008 160829s2016 ne b 001 0 lat
010 $a 2016026251
019 $a951032544$a962180269
020 $a9789027214683$qhardcover$qalkaline paper
020 $a9027214689$qhardcover$qalkaline paper
020 $z9789027266477 (online)
020 $a9027266476
020 $a9789027266477
024 3 $a9789027214683
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn951505870
035 $a(OCoLC)951505870$z(OCoLC)951032544$z(OCoLC)962180269
035 $a(NNC)12317877
040 $aDLC$beng$erda$cDLC$dBTCTA$dYDXCP$dBDX$dOCLCO$dOCLCA$dERASA$dOCLCF$dYDX$dOCLCO$dOHX$dDEBBG$dOCLCO
041 0 $alat$aeng
042 $apcc
050 00 $aB438.N52$bE9436 2016
072 7 $aB$2lcco
082 00 $a160$223
084 $a5,1$2ssgn
084 $aCE 5400$2rvk
084 $aCC 2500$2rvk
084 $aCE 1095$2rvk
245 00 $aNicholas of Amsterdam :$bcommentary on the Old Logic : critical edition with introduction and indexes /$cEgbert P. Bos.
264 1 $aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia :$bJohn Benjamins Publishing Company,$c[2016]
300 $aliv, 382 pages ;$c25 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aBochumer studien zur philosophie,$x1384-668X ;$vBand 58
546 $aPrimarily Latin; introduction and preliminary material in English.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes.
520 8 $aMaster Nicholas of Amsterdam was a prominent master of arts in Germany during the first half of the fifteenth century. He composed various commentaries on Aristotle's works. One of these commentaries is on the 'logica vetus', the old logic, viz. on Porphyry's 'Isagoge' and on Aristotle's 'Categories' and 'On Interpretation'. This commentary is edited and introduced here. Nicholas is a 'modernus' - as opposed to the 'antiqui', who were realists - which means that he is a conceptualist belonging to the university tradition that accepted John Buridan (ca. 1300-1360 or 1361) and Marsilius of Inghen (ca. 1340-1396) as its masters. In medieval philosophy, a parallel between thinking and reality is generally upheld. Nicholas makes a sharp distinction between the two; this may be interpreted as a step towards a separation between the two realms, as is common in philosophy in later centuries. Other characteristics of Nicholas are that he defends the position that science has its place in a proposition, and does not simply follow reality. Furthermore, he emphasizes the part played by individual things. 0Fifteenth-century philosophy has hardly been studied, mainly because that century has long been considered unoriginal. Nicholas of Amsterdam certainly deserves the historian's interest in order to evaluate how medieval philosophy prepared the way for modern philosophy.
600 00 $aAristotle.$tCategoriae.
600 00 $aAristotle.$tDe interpretatione.
600 00 $aPorphyry,$dapproximately 234-approximately 305.$tIsagoge.
630 07 $aCategoriae (Aristotle)$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01357313
630 07 $aDe interpretatione (Aristotle)$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01359296
630 07 $aIsagoge (Porphyry)$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01356577
650 0 $aLogic, Medieval.
650 0 $aLogic, Ancient.
650 7 $aLogic, Ancient.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01002061
650 7 $aLogic, Medieval.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01002062
650 7 $aLogik$2gnd$0(DE-588)4036202-4
700 1 $aBos, Egbert P.,$d1947-$eauthor.
700 02 $aNicholas,$cof Amsterdam,$dapproximately 1390-$tExercitium novae logicae.
776 08 $iOnline version:$tNicholas of Amsterdam$dAmsterdam ; Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company, [2016]$z9789027266477$w(DLC) 2016042546
830 0 $aBochumer Studien zur Philosophie ;$vBd. 58.
856 $uhttp://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029259728&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA$zInhaltsverzeichnis
856 $uhttp://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029259728&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA$zKlappentext
852 00 $bglx$hB438.N52$iE9436 2016