MARC Record from marc_columbia

LEADER: 02283cam a2200421 i 4500
001 12356020
005 20170319220301.0
008 160620s2016 ne b 000 0 eng d
020 $a9789004326613$qpaperback
020 $a9004326618$qpaperback
024 $a99970367063
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn951955859
035 $a(OCoLC)951955859
035 $a(NNC)12356020
040 $aNhCcYBP$beng$erda$cNhCcYBP
043 $aa-cc---
050 4 $aHD2769.2.C6$bS65 2016
082 04 $a338.7$223
100 1 $aSmith, David Horton,$eauthor.
245 10 $aReview and assessment of China's nonprofit sector after Mao :$bemerging civil society? /$cby David Horton Smith with Ting Zhao.
264 1 $aLeiden ;$aBoston :$bBrill,$c[2016]
300 $axii, 67 pages ;$c24 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aBrill research perspectives
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references.
520 8 $aThere has been substantial progress for the NPS and NPOs in China since Mao. The broader scope definition of civil society focuses on the general autonomy of the NPS in relation to the government, with functioning civil liberties, and on the ability of NPOs in general to influence significantly the government on various policy issues. In these terms, China has a comparatively weak but perhaps slowly emerging civil society. The party-state in China does not have either full associational freedom and civil liberties nor participatory or strong democracy as current, stated or operative goals. Indeed, the government has an ambivalent attitude and policies toward the NPS and NPOs. But such ambivalence is at least a huge improvement over Mao's totalitarian repression of the NPS and NPOs.
500 $a"Originally published as Volume 1(5) 2016, in Voluntaristics Review."--Title page verso.
650 0 $aNonprofit organizations$zChina.
650 0 $aCivil society$zChina.
650 0 $aCivil rights$zChina.
650 7 $aNonprofit organizations.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01038875
651 7 $aChina.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01206073
700 1 $aZhao, Ting,$eauthor.
730 0 $aVoluntaristics review.
830 0 $aBrill research perspectives.
852 00 $boff,bus$hHD2769.2.C6$iS65 2016g