It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from marc_columbia

Record ID marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-027.mrc:81539087:4949
Source marc_columbia
Download Link /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-027.mrc:81539087:4949?format=raw

LEADER: 04949cam a2200601 i 4500
001 13215995
005 20180618184257.0
008 170727s2018 alu b s001 0beng
010 $a 2017035686
020 $a9780817319786$qhardcover
020 $a0817319786$qhardcover
020 $z9780817391751$qe book
020 $z0817391754$qe book
024 $a99976199076
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn995846964
035 $a(OCoLC)995846964
035 $a(NNC)13215995
040 $aDLC$beng$erda$cDLC$dOCLCO$dYDX$dNUI$dOCLCF$dOCLCQ$dOCLCO$dBDX$dYDX$dOCLCO$dGUB$dUCX
042 $apcc
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aKF8745.G56$bG53 2018
082 00 $a347.73/2634$223
100 1 $aGibson, Katie L.$q(Katie Lorayne),$d1976-$eauthor.
245 10 $aRuth Bader Ginsburg's legacy of dissent :$bfeminist rhetoric and the law /$cKatie L. Gibson.
264 1 $aTuscaloosa :$bThe University of Alabama Press,$c[2018]
300 $a170 pages ;$c24 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aRhetoric, law, and the humanities
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 $aIntroduction: the patriarchal voice of the law: generic scripts and Bradwell v. Illinois -- Judicial rhetoric and women's place : the legal precedent of separate sphere -- Advancing a language of feminist jurisprudence : Reed v. Reed and Ruth Bader Ginsburg's grandparent brief -- Shifting the boundaries of equal protection : Justice Ginsburg's defense of progressive constitutionalism in United States v. Virginia -- Confronting the boundaries of abortion jurisprudence : Justice Ginsburg's equality rationale in Gonzales V. Carhart -- Ruth Bader Ginsburg's legacy of dissent : feminist contributions and democratic promise.
520 $a"Ruth Bader Ginsburg's lifelong effort to reshape the language of American law has had profound consequences: she has shifted the rhetorical boundaries of jurisprudence on a wide range of fundamental issues from equal protection to reproductive rights. Beginning in the early 1970s, Ginsburg led a consequential attack on sexist law in the United States. By directly confronting the patriarchal voice of the law, she pointedly challenged an entrenched genre of legal language that silenced the voices and experiences of American women and undermined their status as equal citizens. On the United States Supreme Court, Justice Ginsburg continues to challenge the traditional scripts of legal discourse to insist on a progressive vision of the Constitution and to demand a more inclusive and democratic body of law. This illuminating work examines Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's contributions in reshaping the rhetoric of the law (specifically through the lens of watershed cases in women's rights) and describes her rhetorical contributions--beginning with her work in the 1970s as a lawyer and an advocate for the ACLU's Women's Rights Project through her tenure as a Supreme Court justice. Katie L. Gibson examines Ginsburg's rhetoric to argue that she has dramatically shifted the boundaries of legal language. Gibson draws from rhetorical theory, critical legal theory, and feminist theory to describe the law as a rhetorical genre, arguing that Ginsburg's jurisprudence can appropriately be understood as a direct challenge to the traditional rhetoric of the law. Ruth Bader Ginsburg stands as an incredibly important figure in late twentieth- and early twenty-first-century feminism. While a growing number of admirers celebrate Justice Ginsburg's voice of dissent today, Ginsburg's rhetorical legacy reveals that she has long articulated a sharp and strategic voice of judicial dissent. This study contributes to a more complete understanding of her feminist legacy by detailing the unique contributions of her legal rhetoric." -- Publisher's website.
600 10 $aGinsburg, Ruth Bader.
600 17 $aGinsburg, Ruth Bader.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00009942
650 0 $aWomen judges$zUnited States$vBiography.
650 0 $aJudges$zUnited States$vBiography.
650 0 $aDissenting opinions$zUnited States.
650 0 $aFeminist jurisprudence$zUnited States$xHistory.
650 0 $aWomen's rights$zUnited States$xHistory.
650 0 $aFeminist theory$xHistory.
650 7 $aDissenting opinions.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00895422
650 7 $aFeminist jurisprudence.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00922778
650 7 $aFeminist theory.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00922816
650 7 $aJudges.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00984490
650 7 $aWomen judges.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01178081
650 7 $aWomen's rights.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01178818
651 7 $aUnited States.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01204155
655 7 $aBiography.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01423686
655 7 $aHistory.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01411628
830 0 $aRhetoric, law, and the humanities.
852 00 $bglx$hKF8745.G56$iG53 2018
852 00 $bbar$hKF8745.G56$iG53 2018