MARC Record from marc_columbia

LEADER: 05890cam a2200673 i 4500
001 13885197
005 20190520091522.0
008 130731t20132013miua b s000 0 eng
010 $a 2013025449
024 $a99980855603
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn844308405
040 $aDLC$beng$erda$cDLC$dYDX$dYDXCP$dBTCTA$dERASA$dTYC$dBDX$dCDX$dOCLCF$dIBS$dYUS$dDGU$dDEBBG$dOCLCQ
019 $a844308420$a867123357$a874030997
020 $a9780472052066
020 $a9780472072064$q(hardback)
020 $a0472072064$q(hardback)
020 $a0472052063$q(paper)
020 $z9780472029914$q(e-book)
020 $z0472029916$q(e-book)
024 8 $a40022969208
035 $a(OCoLC)844308405$z(OCoLC)844308420$z(OCoLC)867123357$z(OCoLC)874030997
042 $apcc
050 00 $aD16.12$b.W75 2013
082 00 $a902/.85$223
084 $aHIS016000$aSOC052000$2bisacsh
084 $a8$2ssgn
245 00 $aWriting history in the digital age /$cJack Dougherty, Kristen Nawrotzki, editors.
264 1 $aAnn Arbor :$bUniversity of Michigan Press,$c[2013]
264 4 $c©2013
300 $axi, 283 pages :$billustrations ;$c23 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aDigital humanities
520 $a"Writing History in the Digital Age began as a one-month experiment in October 2010, featuring chapter-length essays by a wide array of scholars with the goal of rethinking traditional practices of researching, writing, and publishing, and the broader implications of digital technology for the historical profession. The essays and discussion topics were posted on a WordPress platform with a special plug-in that allowed readers to add paragraph-level comments in the margins, transforming the work into socially networked texts. This first installment drew an enthusiastic audience, over 50 comments on the texts, and over 1,000 unique visitors to the site from across the globe, with many who stayed on the site for a significant period of time to read the work. To facilitate this new volume, Jack Dougherty and Kristen Nawrotzki designed a born-digital, open-access platform to capture reader comments on drafts and shape the book as it developed. Following a period of open peer review and discussion, the finished product now presents 20 essays from a wide array of notable scholars, each examining (and then breaking apart and reexamining) how digital and emergent technologies have changed the ways that historians think, teach, author, and publish"--$cProvided by publisher.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references.
505 00 $tIs (digital) history more than an argument about the past? /$rSherman Dorn --$tPasts in a digital age /$rStefan Tanaka --$t"I nevertheless am a historian" : digital historical practice and malpractice around black Confederate soldiers /$rLeslie Madsen-Brooks --$tThe historian's craft, popular memory, and Wikipedia /$rRobert S. Wolff --$tThe Wikiblitz : a Wikipedia editing assignment in a first-year undergraduate class /$rShawn Graham --$tWikipedia and women's history : a classroom experience /$rMartha Saxton --$tToward teaching the introductory history course, digitally /$rThomas Harbison and Luke Waltzer --$tLearning how to write analog and digital history /$rAdrea Lawrence --$tTeaching Wikipedia without apologies /$rAmanda Seligman --$tHistorical research and the problem of categories : reflections on 10,000 digital note cards /$rAnsley T. Erickson --$tCreating meaning in a sea of information : the Women and social movements Web sites /$rKathryn Kish Sklar and Thomas Dublin --$tThe hermeneutics of data and historical writing /$rFred Gibbs and Trevor Owens --$tVisualizations and historical arguments /$rJohn Theibault --$tPutting Harlem on the map /$rStephen Robertson --$tPox and the city : challenges in writing a digital history game /$rLaura Zucconi, Ethan Watrall, Hannah Ueno, and Lisa Rosner --$tWriting Chicana/o history with the Seattle Civil Rights and Labor History Project /$rOscar Rosales Castañeda --$tCitizen scholars : Facebook and the co-creation of knowledge /$rAmanda Grace Sikarskie --$tThe HeritageCrowd Project : a case study in crowdsourcing public history /$rShawn Graham, Guy Massie, and Nadine Feuerherm --$tThe accountability partnership : writing and surviving in the digital age /$rNatalia Mehlman Petrzela and Sarah Manekin --$tOnly typing? : informal writing, Blogging, and the academy /$rAlex Sayf Cummings and Jonathan Jarrett --$tConclusions : what we learned from Writing history in the digital age /$rJack Dougherty, Kristen Nawrotzi, Charlotte D. Rochez, and Timothy Burke.
650 0 $aHistory$xMethodology.
650 0 $aAcademic writing$xData processing.
650 0 $aHistory$xResearch$xData processing.
650 0 $aHistoriography.
650 0 $aElectronic data processing.
650 4 $aHISTORY$xHistoriography$xbisacsh.
650 4 $aSOCIAL SCIENCE$xMedia Studies$xbisacsh.
650 7 $aHISTORY$xHistoriography.$2bisacsh
650 7 $aSOCIAL SCIENCE$xMedia Studies.$2bisacsh
650 7 $aAcademic writing$xData processing.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00795094
650 7 $aElectronic data processing.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00906956
650 7 $aHistoriography.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00958221
650 7 $aHistory$xMethodology.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00958259
650 7 $aHistory$xResearch$xData processing.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00958284
650 07 $aDigitale Revolution.$0(DE-588)7854804-4$2gnd
650 07 $aGeschichtsschreibung.$0(DE-588)4020531-9$2gnd
655 4 $aAufsatzsammlung.
700 1 $aDougherty, Jack.
700 1 $aNawrotzki, Kristen.
776 08 $iOnline version:$tWriting history in the digital age.$d[Hartford, Conn.] : Trinity College$w(OCoLC)756644249
830 0 $aDigital humanities (Ann Arbor, Mich.)
852 00 $bbar$hD16.12$i.W75 2013