It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from marc_columbia

Record ID marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-028.mrc:37104967:3002
Source marc_columbia
Download Link /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-028.mrc:37104967:3002?format=raw

LEADER: 03002cam a2200481 i 4500
001 13572884
005 20181128150052.0
006 m o d
007 cr |n|||||||||
008 181018s2017 ii o 000 0 eng c
035 $a(OCoLC)on1057444475
035 $a(OCoLC)1057444475
035 $a(NNC)13572884
040 $aZCU$beng$erda$cZCU
042 $apcc
043 $aa-ii---
050 4 $aHD5710.85.I42
100 1 $aRajasekhar, D.,$eauthor.
245 10 $aIs decentralisation promoting or hindering the effective implementation of MGNREGS? :$bthe evidence from Karnataka /$cD. Rajasekhar, Salim Lakha, R. Manjula.
264 1 $aBangalore :$bInstitute for Social and Economic Change,$c2017.
300 $a1 online resource (18 pages)
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $acomputer$bc$2rdamedia
338 $aonline resource$bcr$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aWorking paper ;$v395
588 $aIdentification of the resource based on contents viewed on October 16, 2018; title from electronic title page.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references.
520 $aDecentralisation is viewed by some as an effective means of improving governance and equitable spread of development benefits. This paper examines the process of distribution of social protection benefits through decentralised governance by looking at the implementation of Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) in Karnataka, which is ranked high on the devolution index. But, the implementation of MGNREGS under decentralised governance has produced lacklustre results and uneven benefits. Powerful social actors at the local level have devised careful modus operandi to dilute transparency mechanisms and stifle voices from below to subvert the scheme to suit their interests.
610 20 $aNational Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (India)$xEvaluation.
610 27 $aNational Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (India)$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01788014
650 0 $aManpower policy, Rural$zIndia$zKarnataka.
650 0 $aDecentralization in government$xEconomic aspects$zIndia$zKarnataka.
650 7 $aDecentralization in government$xEconomic aspects.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00888953
650 7 $aEvaluation.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00916975
650 7 $aManpower policy, Rural.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01007924
651 7 $aIndia$zKarnataka.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01206738
700 1 $aLakha, Salim,$eauthor.
700 1 $aManjula, R.,$eauthor.
776 08 $iElectronic reproduction of (manifestation):$tIs decentralisation promoting or hindering the effective implementation of MGNREGS?$dBengaluru : Institute for Social and Economic Change, 2017$w(DLC) 2017353620$w(OCoLC)1044768705
830 0 $aWorking paper (Institute for Social and Economic Change) ;$v395.
856 40 $uhttp://www.columbia.edu/cgi-bin/cul/resolve?clio13572884.001$zCurrent site
856 40 $uhttp://www.columbia.edu/cgi-bin/cul/resolve?clio13572884.002$zArchived site
852 8 $blweb$hEBOOKS