MARC Record from marc_columbia

LEADER: 03959cam a2200481 i 4500
001 14435218
005 20200214133132.0
008 190918s2020 ne b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2019042148
035 $a(OCoLC)on1121421798
040 $aDLC$beng$erda$cDLC$dOCLCF$dOCLCO
020 $a9789004415584$q(hardback)
020 $a9004415580
020 $z9789004415591$q(ebook)
035 $a(OCoLC)1121421798
042 $apcc
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aK357$b.N43 2020
082 00 $a340/.1150973$223
049 $aZCUA
100 1 $aNeacsu, Dana,$eauthor.
245 14 $aThe bourgeois charm of Karl Marx & the ideological irony of American jurisprudence /$cby Dana Neacsu.
246 3 $aBourgeois charm of Karl Marx and the ideological irony of American jurisprudence
263 $a2001
264 1 $aLeiden ;$aBoston :$bBrill,$c[2020]
300 $a267 pages ;$c24 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
490 0 $aStudies in critical social sciences,$x1573-4234 ;$vvolume 158
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 $aIntroduction -- Contextualizing Marx : Differentiating to Embrace or to Reject? -- Marxian or Marxism : Labels Differentiating Content or Fabricating Difference? -- Textual Differences and Marx's Interdisciplinary Dialectics -- Private Subjectivity, Alienation and Theory Production -- Ideology as Public (Political) Subjectivity -- The Irony of Scholarship Production -- Ideological Irony : S₂ Actuating T₁'s Meaning -- The Bearable Lightness of Jurisprudential Irony -- Ironical Ideology, Difference of Meaning and Philosophical Camaraderie -- Irony, Jurisprudential Meaning-Making and Ideological Camaraderie -- Summary and Conclusion .
520 $a"The Bourgeois Charm of Karl Marx & the Ideological Irony of American Jurisprudence employs a well-known body of work, Marx's, to explain the inevitable limits of scholarship, in hopes to encourage academic boldness, and diversity, especially within American jurisprudence. While scholarly meaning-making has been addressed in specific academic areas, mostly linguistics and philosophy, it has never been addressed in a triangular relationship between the text (T1) and its instigator (S1), as well as its subsequent interpellator (S2). Furthermore, while addressed as a result of difference, it has never been addressed for today's liberal theory, which includes liberal jurisprudence, through the mirror of Marxist difference. Scholarship is the unique product of the instigator's private and public subjectivity, as all theory is aimed to be communicated and used by the scholarly community and beyond. Understanding its public life, textual instigators (S1) aim to control its meaning employing various research methods to observe reality and then to convey their narrative, or 'philosophy'. But meaning is not fixed; it is negotiated by S1 and those theories interpellate (S2), according to their own private and public subjectivity, which covers their ideology. Negotiated meaning is always a surprise to both S1 and S2, surprise which is both ironic and ideological. The book has ten chapters, an index and a list of references"--$cProvided by publisher.
650 0 $aLaw and socialism.
650 0 $aJurisprudence$zUnited States.
600 10 $aMarx, Karl,$d1818-1883$xInfluence.
600 17 $aMarx, Karl,$d1818-1883.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00030215
650 7 $aInfluence (Literary, artistic, etc.)$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00972484
650 7 $aJurisprudence.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00985043
650 7 $aLaw and socialism.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00993920
651 7 $aUnited States.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01204155
776 08 $iOnline version:$aNeacsu, Dana,$tThe bourgeois charm of Karl Marx & the ideological irony of American jurisprudence$dLeiden ; Boston : Brill, [2020]$z9789004415591$w(DLC) 2019042149
852 00 $bleh$hK357$i.N43 2020