MARC Record from marc_columbia

LEADER: 04206cam a2200829 i 4500
001 14966423
005 20220528233829.0
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 200227s2020 nyu ob 001 0 eng
010 $a 2020010396
035 $a(OCoLC)on1143795376
035 $a(NNC)14966423
040 $aDLC$beng$erda$cDLC$dOCLCF$dYDX$dTYFRS$dEBLCP$dDLC$dOCLCO$dOCLCQ$dUKAHL$dOCLCO
019 $a1175676323$a1175914582
020 $a9781000093254$q(epub)
020 $a1000093255
020 $a9781003055259$q(ebk)
020 $a1003055257
020 $a9781000093223$q(mobi)
020 $a1000093220
020 $a9781000093193$q(adobe pdf)
020 $a1000093190
020 $z9780367135645$q(hbk)
020 $z9780367135652$q(pbk)
020 $z0367135655
020 $z0367135647
035 $a(OCoLC)1143795376$z(OCoLC)1175676323$z(OCoLC)1175914582
037 $a9781003055259$bTaylor & Francis
042 $apcc
050 00 $aBJ1031
072 7 $aPHI$x000000$2bisacsh
072 7 $aHPQ$2bicssc
082 00 $a170/.42$223
049 $aZCUA
100 1 $aCraig, William Lane,$eauthor.
245 12 $aA debate on God and morality :$bwhat is the best account of objective moral values and duties? /$cWilliam Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg ; edited by Adam Lloyd Johnson.
263 $a2006
264 1 $aNew York, NY :$bRoutledge,$c2020.
300 $a1 online resource
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $acomputer$bn$2rdamedia
338 $aonline resource$bnc$2rdacarrier
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
520 $a"In 2018, William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg participated in a debate at North Carolina State University, addressing the question: "God and Morality: What is the best account of objective moral values and duties?" Craig argued that theism provides a sound foundation for objective morality whereas atheism does not. Wielenberg countered that morality can be objective even if there is no God. This book includes the full debate, as well as endnotes with extended discussions that were not included in the debate. It also includes five chapters by other philosophers who have written substantive responses to the debate - J. P. Moreland, David Baggett, Mark Linville, Wes Morriston, and Michael Huemer. The book provides crucial resources for better understanding moral realism and its dependence on, or independence from, theistic foundations. Key features a valuable debate about whether or not God is the best explanation for objective morality, bringing together theists and atheists working on the same subject who normally are not in conversation with each other. Includes clear coverage of ontological and epistemological issues in metaethical theories, focusing on Divine Command Theory and Non-natural Robust Moral Realism. Engaging and accessible throughout, making the book well suited for undergraduate and seminary classrooms"--$cProvided by publisher.
588 $aDescription based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher.
650 0 $aEthics.
650 0 $aGod.
650 0 $aTheism.
650 0 $aAtheism.
650 0 $aMoral realism.
650 2 $aEthics
650 6 $aMorale.
650 6 $aDieu.
650 6 $aThéisme.
650 6 $aAthéisme.
650 6 $aRéalisme moral.
650 7 $aethics (philosophy)$2aat
650 7 $aatheism.$2aat
650 7 $aPHILOSOPHY / General$2bisacsh
650 7 $aAtheism.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00819974
650 7 $aEthics.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00915833
650 7 $aGod.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00944037
650 7 $aMoral realism.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01026092
650 7 $aTheism.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01149471
655 0 $aElectronic books.
655 4 $aElectronic books.
700 1 $aWielenberg, Erik J.$q(Erik Joseph),$d1972-$eauthor.
700 1 $aJohnson, Adam Lloyd,$eeditor.
776 08 $iPrint version:$aCraig, William Lane.$tA debate on God and morality$dNew York, NY : Routledge, 2020.$z9780367135645$w(DLC) 2020010395
856 40 $uhttp://www.columbia.edu/cgi-bin/cul/resolve?clio14966423$zTaylor & Francis eBooks
852 8 $blweb$hEBOOKS