It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from marc_columbia

Record ID marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-030.mrc:213947780:3318
Source marc_columbia
Download Link /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-030.mrc:213947780:3318?format=raw

LEADER: 03318cam a2200553 i 4500
001 14972845
005 20220604233650.0
006 m o d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 160627s2016 enk o 000 0 eng d
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn952338371
035 $a(NNC)14972845
040 $aN$T$beng$erda$epn$cN$T$dYDXCP$dIDEBK$dEBLCP$dOCLCF$dOCLCQ$dYDX$dMERUC$dOCLCA$dOCLCQ$dOCLCO$dOCLCQ$dK6U$dOCLCO$dOCLCQ$dOCLCO
020 $a9781134859344$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a1134859341$q(electronic bk.)
020 $z9781138685246
020 $z1138685240
035 $a(OCoLC)952338371
050 4 $aB
072 7 $aPHI$x035000$2bisacsh
072 7 $aPHI$x021000$2bisacsh
082 04 $a100$222
049 $aZCUA
245 00 $aEinstein, Tagore and the nature of reality /$cpartha Ghose.
264 1 $aBasingstoke :$bTaylor & Francis Ltd,$c2016.
300 $a1 online resource (256 pages)
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $acomputer$bc$2rdamedia
338 $aonline resource$bcr$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aRoutledge Studies in the Philosophy of Mathematics and Physics
520 8 $aThe nature of reality has been a long-debated issue among scientists and philosophers. In 1930, Rabindranath Tagore and Albert Einstein had a long conversation on the nature of reality. This conversation has been widely quoted and discussed by scientists, philosophers and scholars from the literary world. The important question that Tagore and Einstein discussed was whether the world is a unity dependent on humanity, or the world is a reality independent on the human factor. Einstein took the stand adopted by Western philosophers and mathematicians, namely that reality is something independent of the mind and the human factor. Tagore, on the other hand, adopted the opposite view. Nevertheless, both Einstein and Tagore claimed to be realists despite the fundamental differences between their conceptions of reality. Where does the difference lie? Can it be harmonized at some deeper level? Can Wittgenstein, for example, be a bridge between the two views? This collection of essays explores these two fundamentally different conceptions of the nature of reality from the perspectives of theories of space-time, quantum theory, general philosophy of science, cognitive science and mathematics.
588 0 $aPrint version record.
600 10 $aEinstein, Albert,$d1879-1955.
600 10 $aTagore, Rabindranath,$d1861-1941.
600 17 $aEinstein, Albert,$d1879-1955.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00032023
600 17 $aTagore, Rabindranath,$d1861-1941.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00052355
650 0 $aReality.
650 0 $aScience$xPhilosophy.
650 6 $aRéalité.
650 7 $aPHILOSOPHY$xEssays.$2bisacsh
650 7 $aPHILOSOPHY$xReference.$2bisacsh
650 7 $aReality.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01091244
650 7 $aScience$xPhilosophy.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01108336
655 4 $aElectronic books.
700 1 $aGhose, Partha.
776 08 $iPrint version:$tEinstein, Tagore and the nature of reality.$dBasingstoke : Taylor & Francis Ltd 2016$z9781138685246$w(OCoLC)949771012
830 0 $aRoutledge studies in the philosophy of mathematics and physics.
856 40 $uhttp://www.columbia.edu/cgi-bin/cul/resolve?clio14972845$zTaylor & Francis eBooks
852 8 $blweb$hEBOOKS