MARC Record from marc_columbia

LEADER: 04164cam a2200613 i 4500
001 15134294
005 20221119233502.0
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 180720s2019 nyu ob 001 0 eng
010 $a 2020692194
035 $a(OCoLC)on1049801362
035 $a(NNC)15134294
040 $aDLC$beng$erda$cDLC$dN$T$dYDX$dOCLCF$dNAM$dVT2$dTKN$dOCLCO$dK6U$dOCLCO
020 $a9781351210225$qebook
020 $a135121022X
020 $a9781351210249$qebook
020 $a1351210246
020 $z9780815381525$qhardback
035 $a(OCoLC)1049801362
043 $acl-----
050 00 $aHV6771.L29
072 7 $aSOC$x004000$2bisacsh
082 00 $a364.1/45098$223
049 $aZCUA
100 1 $aTorres Wong, Marcela,$eauthor.
245 10 $aNatural resources, extraction and indigenous rights in Latin America :$bexploring the boundaries of environmental and state corporate crime in Bolivia, Peru and Mexico /$cMarcela Torres Wong.
250 $a1 Edition.
264 1 $aNew York :$bRoutledge,$c2019.
300 $a1 online resource.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $acomputer$bc$2rdamedia
338 $aonline resource$bcr$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aCrimes of the powerful
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
588 $aDescription based on print version record.
520 $aIn 1989, the International Labor Organization stated that all indigenous peoples living in the postcolonial world were entitled to the right to prior consultation, over activities that could potentially impact their territories and traditional livelihoods. However, in many cases the economic importance of industries such as mining and oil condition the way that governments implement the right to prior consultation. This book explores extractive conflicts between indigenous populations, the government and oil and mining companies in Latin America, namely Mexico, Peru and Bolivia. Building on two years of research and drawing on the state-corporate and environmental crime literatures, this book examines the legal, extralegal, illegal as well as political strategies used by the state and extractive companies to avoid undesired results produced by the legalization of the right to prior consultation. It examines the ways in which prior consultation is utilized by powerful indigenous actors to negotiate economic resources with the state and extractive companies, while also showing the ways in which weaker indigenous groups are incapable of engaging in prior consultations in a meaningful way and are therefore left at the mercy of negative ecological impacts. It demonstrates how social mobilization--not prior consultation--is the most effective strategy in preventing extraction from moving forward within ecologically fragile indigenous territories.
505 00 $tIntroduction --$t1.What do indigenous people want? --$t2. Ecological defense or bargaining over indigenous lands? --$t3. Rights do not matter, political power does --$t4. There is nothing to consult here! --$t5. Prior consultation and the expansion of extractivism --$t6. Conclusions --$tIndex
650 0 $aCorporations$xCorrupt practices$zLatin America.
650 0 $aNatural resources$zLatin America.
650 0 $aIndigenous peoples$zLatin America.
650 6 $aSociétés$xPratiques déloyales$zAmérique latine.
650 6 $aRessources naturelles$zAmérique latine.
650 7 $aSOCIAL SCIENCE$xCriminology.$2bisacsh
650 7 $aIndigenous peoples.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00970213
650 7 $aCorporations$xCorrupt practices.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00879825
650 7 $aNatural resources.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01034403
651 7 $aLatin America.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01245945
655 0 $aElectronic books.
655 4 $aElectronic books.
776 08 $iPrint version:$tNatural resources, extraction and indigenous rights in Latin America$dNew York : Routledge, 2019.$z9780815381525 (hardback)$w(DLC) 2018019009
830 0 $aCrimes of the powerful.
856 40 $uhttp://www.columbia.edu/cgi-bin/cul/resolve?clio15134294$zTaylor & Francis eBooks
852 8 $blweb$hEBOOKS