MARC Record from marc_columbia

LEADER: 03576cam a2200589Ma 4500
001 15082075
005 20220627125724.0
006 m o d
007 cr cn|||||||||
008 090727s2010 njua ob 001 0 eng d
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn715164326
035 $a(NNC)15082075
040 $aE7B$beng$epn$cE7B$dOCLCQ$dYDXCP$dN$T$dOCLCQ$dOCLCF$dIDEBK$dEBLCP$dOCLCQ$dDEBSZ$dOCLCQ$dYDX$dOCLCQ$dTYFRS$dOCLCQ$dK6U$dOCLCO$dSFB$dOCLCO
019 $a923430207$a988539027$a1260364540
020 $a9781412815529$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a1412815525$q(electronic bk.)
020 $z9781412810753
020 $z1412810752
020 $a9781315124537$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a131512453X$q(electronic bk.)
035 $a(OCoLC)715164326$z(OCoLC)923430207$z(OCoLC)988539027$z(OCoLC)1260364540
050 4 $aH97$b.M555 2010eb
072 7 $aPOL$x028000$2bisacsh
082 04 $a320.6$222
049 $aZCUA
245 00 $aMind the gap :$bperspectives on policy evaluation and the social sciences /$cJos Vaessen and Frans L. Leeuw, editors.
260 $aNew Brunswick [N.J.] :$bTransaction Publishers,$c©2010.
300 $a1 online resource (x, 244 pages) :$billustrations.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $acomputer$bc$2rdamedia
338 $aonline resource$bcr$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aComparative policy evaluation ;$vv. 16
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 $aUS sociology and evaluation : issues in the relationship between methodology and theory / Nicoletta Stame -- Evaluation and the disciplines in development / Robert Picciotto -- Economics and evaluation / Sandra Speer -- The intellectual underpinnings of a comprehensive body of evaluative knowledge : the case of INTEVAL / Lisa Birch and Steve Jacob -- Public management theory, evaluation, and evidence-based policy / Robert Schwartz -- Interventions as theories : closing the gap between evaluation and the disciplines? / Jos Vaessen and Frans L. Leeuw -- Middle range theory and program theory evaluation : from provenance to practice / Ray Pawson -- Realistic evaluation and disciplinary knowledge : applications from the field of criminology / Nick Tilley.
588 0 $aPrint version record.
520 1 $a"Mind the Gap has a twofold aim. The first is to highlight and characterize the gap between evaluation practices and debates, and the substantive knowledge debates within the social and behavioral sciences. The second is to show why this gap is problematic for the practice of evaluation, while at the same time illustrating possible ways to build bridges. The book is centered on the value of producing useful evaluation grounded in social science theory and research."--Jacket.
650 0 $aPolicy sciences$xEvaluation.
650 0 $aSocial sciences.
650 6 $aSciences de la politique$xÉvaluation.
650 6 $aSciences sociales.
650 7 $asocial sciences.$2aat
650 7 $aPOLITICAL SCIENCE$xPublic Policy$xGeneral.$2bisacsh
650 7 $aPolicy sciences$xEvaluation.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01068803
650 7 $aSocial sciences.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01122877
655 0 $aElectronic books.
655 4 $aElectronic books.
700 1 $aVaessen, Jos.
700 1 $aLeeuw, Frans L.
776 08 $iPrint version:$tMind the gap.$dNew Brunswick [N.J.] : Transaction Publishers, ©2010$w(DLC) 2009029165
830 0 $aComparative policy evaluation series ;$vv. 16.
856 40 $uhttp://www.columbia.edu/cgi-bin/cul/resolve?clio15082075$zTaylor & Francis eBooks
852 8 $blweb$hEBOOKS