MARC Record from marc_columbia

LEADER: 03579cam a2200469Mi 4500
001 15804708
005 20220224105240.0
008 200514s2020 ne ad bm 000 0 eng d
035 $a(OCoLC)on1285278015
040 $aERASA$beng$erda$cERASA$dZCU
020 $a9789463662758
020 $a9463662758
035 $a(OCoLC)1285278015
041 $aeng$adut
043 $ae-ne---
050 4 $aNA7115$b.G45 2020
082 04 $a724.6
049 $aZCUA
100 1 $aGeldermans, Bob,$d1970-$eauthor
245 10 $aSecuring healthy circular material flows in the built environment :$bthe case of indoor partitioning /$cBob Geldermans
264 1 $aDelft :$bBK Books,$c2020
300 $a280 pages :$billustations, charts ;$c24 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aA+BE Architecture and the Built Environment$v2020/06
502 $aDoctoral thesis, Technische Universiteit Delft, 2020
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references
520 8 $aMulti-family buildings usually have a fixed subdivision in units with standard layouts. However, households are all different and change over time, as so do their needs and desires. With this in mind, the Open Building concept, which originated in the 1960s, proposed two levels of intervention and decision-making: the (collective) 'support' and (individual) 'infill'. Although the Open Building approach has been embraced conceptually, with a new wave of interest in the Netherlands in recent years, it is remarkably overlooked in the actual design and construction of housing. The current attention for Circular Building puts, once again, the spotlight on Open Building. This renewed attention is due to the shared benefits around flexibility, and as such Circular Building and Open Building are two sides of the same coin. However, there is a big difference between accommodating unforeseen use of space and accommodating foreseen circularity-conditions for material management. Moreover, thus far little attention has been paid to residential user perspectives or the operational processes of Circular Building product and material cycles. Securing healthy circular material flows in the built environment cannot be the objective of one industry, let alone one organisation, but reshuffles whole value networks. This doctoral research adopts multiple perspectives and cuts through different scales and disciplines to derive criteria for indoor partitioning, with an emphasis on user health and well-being, flexibility and circularity. Although focused on partitioning, the findings can be applied to other components, such as kitchen cabinets, furniture, stairs, or to the interior side-sheeting and insulation of walls and ceilings in energy renovations
546 $aIn English with summary in Dutch
650 7 $aPartitions (Building)$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01054187
650 7 $aRoom layout (Dwellings)$xPlanning$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01100364
650 7 $aSpace (Architecture)$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01127601
650 7 $aInterior architecture$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00976313
650 7 $aApartment houses$xPlanning$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00811169
650 7 $aArchitecture, Domestic$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00813666
651 7 $aNetherlands$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01204034
648 7 $a2000-2099$2fast
655 7 $aAcademic theses$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01726453
710 2 $aTechnische Universiteit Delft,$edegree granting institution.
830 0 $aA+BE Architecture and the Built Environment ;$v2020/06.
852 00 $boff,ave$hNA7115$i.G45 2020g