MARC Record from marc_columbia

LEADER: 04054cam a2200601 i 4500
001 15525134
005 20220423225810.0
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 200901s2021 nyub ob 000 0 eng
010 $a 2020040296
035 $a(OCoLC)on1193559580
035 $a(NNC)15525134
040 $aDLC$beng$erda$epn$cDLC$dOCLCO$dEBLCP$dOCLCO$dJSTOR$dMUU$dN$T$dOCLCO$dYDX$dUKAHL$dTEFOD$dOCLCA$dOCLCF$dOCLCO$dK6U$dOCLCA$dWAU$dOCLCO
020 $a9781734420739$qelectronic book
020 $a1734420731$qelectronic book
020 $z9781734420722$qpaperback
020 $z1734420723$qpaperback
035 $a(OCoLC)1193559580
037 $a22573/ctv1fv65p9$bJSTOR
037 $a4FB1B28C-69F4-4B21-BA57-EF31D398F3E8$bOverDrive, Inc.$nhttp://www.overdrive.com
042 $apcc
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aR853.H8$bW37 2021
060 00 $aW 20.55.H9
082 00 $a174.2/8$223
049 $aZCUA
100 1 $aWashington, Harriet A.,$eauthor.
245 10 $aCarte blanche :$bthe erosion of medical consent /$cHarriet A. Washington.
264 1 $aNew York, NY :$bColumbia Global Reports,$c[2021]
300 $a1 online resource (189 pages) :$billustrations, maps
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $acomputer$bc$2rdamedia
338 $aonline resource$bcr$2rdacarrier
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references.
505 0 $aPreface: informed consent in the time of infection -- Exigencies of war -- The legacy of Nuremberg -- False blood -- "The other" -- Cold-blooded killer -- Pushing "Special K" -- Erasing consent -- Conclusion: reclaiming choice -- A bestiary of involition -- The Nuremberg Code.
520 $a"Carte Blanche is the alarming tale of how the right of Americans to say "no" to risky medical research is eroding at a time when we are racing to produce a vaccine and treatments for Covid-19. This medical right that we have long taken for granted was first sacrificed on the altar of military expediency in 1990 when the Department of Defense asked for and received from the FDA a waiver that permitted it to force an experimental anthrax vaccine on the ranks of ground troops headed for the Persian Gulf. Since then, the military has pressed ahead to impose nonconsensual testing of the blood substitute PolyHeme in civilian urbanities, quietly enrolling more than 20,000 non-consenting subjects since 2005. Most Americans think that their right to give or withhold consent is protected by law, but the passing in 1996 of modifications to the Code of Federal Regulations, such as statute CFR 21 50.24, now permit investigators to conduct research with trauma victims without their consent or event their knowledge. More than a dozen studies since have used the 1996 loophole to recruit large numbers of subjects without their knowledge. The erosion of consent is the result of a U.S. medical-research system that has proven again and again that it cannot be trusted"--$cProvided by publisher.
588 $aDescription based on online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on March 03, 2021).
650 0 $aInformed consent (Medical law)
650 0 $aHuman experimentation in medicine$xMoral and ethical aspects.
650 12 $aInformed Consent$xethics
650 22 $aHuman Experimentation$xethics
650 22 $aResearcher-Subject Relations$xethics
651 2 $aUnited States
650 6 $aConsentement éclairé (Droit médical)
650 6 $aExpérimentation humaine en médecine$xAspect moral.
650 7 $aHuman experimentation in medicine$xMoral and ethical aspects.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00963051
650 7 $aInformed consent (Medical law)$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00973191
655 0 $aElectronic books.
655 4 $aElectronic books.
776 08 $iPrint version:$aWashington, Harriet A..$tCarte blanche$dNew York, NY : Columbia Global Reports, [2021]$z9781734420722$w(DLC) 2020040295$w(OCoLC)1180970611
856 40 $uhttp://www.columbia.edu/cgi-bin/cul/resolve?clio15525134$zAll EBSCO eBooks
852 8 $blweb$hEBOOKS