| Record ID | marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-033.mrc:12852279:3320 |
| Source | marc_columbia |
| Download Link | /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-033.mrc:12852279:3320?format=raw |
LEADER: 03320cam a2200493 i 4500
001 16059305
005 20220426092614.0
008 210614t20212021enk b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2021026792
035 $a(OCoLC)on1237633781
040 $aDLC$beng$erda$cDLC$dYDX$dOCLCO$dOCLCF$dUKMGB$dYDX$dOCLCO
015 $aGBC1B7708$2bnb
016 7 $a020272048$2Uk
020 $a9781108843225$qhardcover
020 $a1108843220$qhardcover
020 $z9781108915151$qelectronic publication
020 $z9781108910897$qelectronic book
035 $a(OCoLC)1237633781
042 $apcc
050 00 $aJZ6374$b.D39 2021
082 00 $a341.5/84$223
084 $aPOL011000$2bisacsh
049 $aZCUA
100 1 $aDayal, Anjali Kaushlesh,$eauthor.
245 10 $aIncredible commitments :$bhow UN peacekeeping failures shape peace processes /$cAnjali Kaushlesh Dayal, Fordham University.
264 1 $aCambridge, United Kingdom ;$aNew York, NY :$bCambridge University Press,$c2021.
264 4 $c©2021
300 $ax, 213 pages ;$c24 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 $aIntroduction -- The social context of international peacekeeping and the alternative benefits of bargaining -- Methods and case selection -- The Arusha negotiations, 1990-1994: UNAMIR in the shadow of Somalia -- Guatemala, 1989-1996: MINUGUA in light of El Salvador -- Conclusion.
520 $a"Why do warring parties turn to United Nations peacekeeping and peacemaking even when they think it will fail? Dayal asks why UN peacekeeping survived its early catastrophes in Somalia, Rwanda, and the Balkans, and how this survival should make us reconsider how peacekeeping works. She makes two key arguments: First, she argues the UN's central role in peacemaking and peacekeeping worldwide means UN interventions have structural consequences - what the UN does in one conflict can shift the strategies, outcomes, and options available to negotiating parties in other conflicts. Second, drawing on interviews, archival research, and processtraced peace negotiations in Rwanda and Guatemala, Dayal argues warring parties turn to the UN even when they have little faith in peacekeepers' ability to uphold peace agreements - and even little actual interest in peace - because its involvement in negotiation processes provides vital, unique tactical, symbolic, and post-conflict reconstruction benefits only the UN can offer"--$cProvided by publisher.
610 20 $aUnited Nations$xPeacekeeping forces.
610 20 $aUnited Nations.$bSecurity Council.
650 0 $aResponsibility to protect (International law)
650 7 $aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / International Relations / General.$2bisacsh
610 27 $aUnited Nations.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00530351
610 27 $aUnited Nations.$bSecurity Council.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00545731
650 7 $aPeacekeeping forces.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01055909
650 7 $aResponsibility to protect (International law)$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01895199
776 08 $iOnline version:$aDayal, Anjali Kaushlesh.$tIncredible commitments$dCambridge ; New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 2021$z9781108915151$w(DLC) 2021026793
852 00 $bleh$hJZ6374$i.D39 2021