It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from marc_columbia

Record ID marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-033.mrc:43706023:5776
Source marc_columbia
Download Link /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-033.mrc:43706023:5776?format=raw

LEADER: 05776cam a2200709 i 4500
001 16097836
005 20221015233113.0
006 m o d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 220401s2022 enk ob 001 0 eng c
035 $a(OCoLC)on1308515667
035 $a(NNC)16097836
040 $aTYFRS$beng$erda$epn$cTYFRS$dOCLCO$dTYFRS$dOCLCQ$dN$T$dTYFRS$dYDX$dLUU$dGWL$dUAB$dTYFRS
019 $a1323453421$a1326071739
020 $a9781003264262$q(electronic book)
020 $a1003264263$q(electronic book)
020 $a9781000589931$q(electronic book ;$qPDF)
020 $a1000589935$q(electronic book ;$qPDF)
020 $a9781000589993$q(electronic book ;$qEPUB)
020 $a1000589994$q(electronic book ;$qEPUB)
020 $z9781032205847$q(hardback)
020 $z9781032205878$q(paperback)
024 7 $a10.4324/9781003264262$2doi
035 $a(OCoLC)1308515667$z(OCoLC)1323453421$z(OCoLC)1326071739
037 $a9781003264262$bTaylor & Francis
042 $apcc
050 4 $aK3370$b.C665 2022eb
072 7 $aLAW$x000000$2bisacsh
072 7 $aLAW$x016000$2bisacsh
072 7 $aLAW$x018000$2bisacsh
072 7 $aLND$2bicssc
082 04 $a342$222
049 $aZCUA
245 00 $aConstitutional law and precedent :$binternational perspectives on case-based reasoning /$cedited by Monika Florczak-Wątor.
264 1 $aLondon ;$aNew York :$bRoutledge,$c2022.
300 $a1 online resource (xi, 280 pages)
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $acomputer$bc$2rdamedia
338 $aonline resource$bcr$2rdacarrier
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 00 $tIntroduction : on the methodology of the research on case-based reasoning in constitutional adjudication /$rMonika Florczak-Wątor --$tThe Supreme Court of the United States : legitimate law-maker and constitutional interpreter /$rPaweł Laidler --$tThe Supreme Court of Canada : the road to authority, legitimacy, and independence /$rBradford W. Morse, Kimia Jalilvand --$tPrecedents and case-based reasoning in the Case-Law of The High Court of Australia /$rSelena Bateman, Adrienne Stone --$tThe role of precedents and case-based reasoning in the German Federal Constitutional Court /$rRuth Weber, Laura Wittmann --$tPrecedents and case-based reasoning in the case law of the Hungarian Constitutional Court /$rZoltán Pozsár-Szentmikolsy --$tPrecedents and case-based reasoning in the adjudications of the Italian Constitutional Court /$rGiovanni Cavaggion --$tPrecedents and case-based reasoning in constitutional adjudication : The Republic of Latvia /$rAnita Rodiņa --$tPrecedents and case-based reasoning in the case law of the Constitutional Tribunal of the Republic of Poland /$rPiotr Czarny, Monika Florczak-Wątor --$tThe Role of precedents and case-based reasoning in the Case-Law of the Romanian Constitutional Court /$rBianca Selejan-Guțan, Elena-Simina Tănăsescu --$tCourt of Justice of the European Union : 'stone-by-stone' case-based reasoning /$rAlicja Sikora --$tPrecedent in the system of the European Convention on Human Rights /$rKrzysztof Wojtyczek --$tThe role of case-based reasoning in constitutional adjudication : a comparative study /$rMonika Florczak-Wątor.
520 $a"This collection examines case-based reasoning in constitutional adjudication, that is, how courts decide on constitutional cases by referring to their own prior case law and the case law of other national, foreign and international courts. Argumentation based on judicial authority is now fundamental to the resolution of constitutional disputes. At the same time, it is the most common form of reasoning used by courts. This volume shows not only the strengths and weaknesses of such argumentation, but also its serious methodological shortcomings. The book is comparative in nature, with individual chapters examining similar problems that different courts have resolved in different ways. The research covers three types of courts, namely the civil law constitutional courts of Germany, Italy, Poland, Lithuania, and Hungary, the common law supreme courts of the United States, Canada, and Australia, and the European international courts represented by the European Court of Human Rights, and the Court of Justice of the European Union"--$cProvided by the publisher
545 0 $aMonika Florczak-Wątor is a full professor at the Department of Constitutional Law of the Jagiellonian University in Krakow, a director of the Center for Interdisciplinary Constitutional Studies of the Jagiellonian University and director of the Interdisciplinary Program 'Society of the Future' at the Doctoral School in the Social Sciences of the Jagiellonian University, Poland.
588 $aDescription based on online resource; title from title screen (viewed July 8, 2022).
650 0 $aConstitutional law.
650 0 $aConstitutional courts.
650 0 $aCourts of last resort.
650 0 $aInternational courts.
650 0 $aJudicial process.
650 0 $aStare decisis.
650 6 $aCours constitutionnelles$xPrise de décision.
650 6 $aProcessus judiciaire.
650 6 $aStare decisis.
650 7 $aJudicial process.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00984705
650 7 $aStare decisis.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01131613
650 7 $aLAW / General$2bisacsh
650 7 $aLAW / Comparative$2bisacsh
650 7 $aLAW / Constitutional$2bisacsh
700 1 $aFlorczak-Wątor, Monika,$eeditor.
776 08 $iPrint version:$tConstitutional law and precedent.$dAbingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2022$z9781032205847$w(DLC) 2021057909$w(OCoLC)1295611817
856 40 $uhttp://www.columbia.edu/cgi-bin/cul/resolve?clio16097836$zTaylor & Francis eBooks
852 8 $blweb$hEBOOKS