| Record ID | marc_loc_2016/BooksAll.2016.part27.utf8:60030770:1221 |
| Source | Library of Congress |
| Download Link | /show-records/marc_loc_2016/BooksAll.2016.part27.utf8:60030770:1221?format=raw |
LEADER: 01221cam a2200277 a 4500
001 98105091
003 DLC
005 20130416113538.0
008 980116s1641 enk a 000 0 eng
010 $a 98105091
040 $aDLC$edcrb$cDLC$dDLC
043 $ae-uk---$ae-uk-en
050 00 $aKD379.L3$bF8 1641
100 1 $aFuller, Nicholas,$d1543-1620.
245 14 $aThe argument of Nicholas Fuller of Grayes Inne Esquire, in the case of Tho. Lad and Rich. Mansell his clients :$bwherein it is plainly proved, that the Ecclesiastical Commissioners have no power by their commission to imprison or to fine any of His Majesties subjects or to put them to the oath ex officio.
260 $aLondon :$bPrinted for N. Vavasour,$c1641.
300 $a[4], 32 p. ;$c19 cm. (4to)
500 $aSignatures: pi² A-D⁴.
510 4 $aWing$cF2394
600 10 $aLad, Thomas$xTrials, litigation, etc.
600 10 $aMansell, Richard,$dactive 17th century$xTrials, litigation, etc.
650 0 $aChurch and state$xChurch of England.
650 0 $aEcclesiastical law$zGreat Britain.
700 1 $aLad, Thomas.
700 1 $aMansell, Richard,$dactive 17th century.
710 1 $aEngland and Wales.$bCommissioners for Causes Ecclesiastical.