MARC Record from Library of Congress

LEADER: 04246cam a2200397 i 4500
001 2013001554
003 DLC
005 20151029080818.0
008 130124s2013 tnua b s001 0 eng
010 $a 2013001554
020 $a9781572339477 (pbk.)
020 $a1572339470 (paperback)
040 $aDLC$beng$cDLC$erda$dDLC
042 $apcc
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aNA7205$b.H76 2013
082 00 $a728.0973$223
084 $aARC003000$aHIS036000$2bisacsh
100 1 $aHubka, Thomas C.,$d1946-
245 10 $aHouses without names :$barchitectural nomenclature and the classification of America's common houses /$cThomas C. Hubka.
250 $aFirst Edition.
264 1 $aKnoxville :$bUniversity of Tennessee Press,$c[2013]
300 $ax, 112 pages :$billustrations ;$c27 cm.
336 $atext$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$2rdacarrier
490 0 $aVernacular architecture studies
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 95-107) and index.
520 $a"In countless neighborhoods across America, the streets are lined with houses representing no established architectural style. Many of the 80 million homes in the United States today have only loose-fitting, general names like ranch, duplex, bungalow, and flat. Most, however, cannot even be identified by these common names, much less by an architectural type such as Colonial, Italianate, or Queen Anne. The few regionally recognized vernacular terms-- shotgun, Cape (Cod), three-decker, and the like--remain exceptions rather than the rule. In this innovative, copiously illustrated guide, Thomas C. Hubka considers why most ordinary, working-class houses lack an adequate identifying nomenclature and proposes new ways to name and classify these anonymous structures, shedding a fresh light on their role in the development of American domestic culture and its housing landscape. Popular, developer-built, tract, speculative, everyday--whatever they are called, these common homes constitute the largest portion of American housing in all regions and historic periods. Without classification, these dwellings tend to be left out of histories of American building, neglected in preservation surveys and plans, and ignored when it comes to considering their impact on American culture. Current methods of interpreting common houses need not be replaced, Hubka shows, but only modified to include a broader, more complete spectrum of common dwellings. As Hubka explains, by applying an order of census and a floor-plan analysis, scholars can adequately characterize the actual homes in which most Americans live, particularly in recent times after the widespread growth of suburban homes. Based on years of field observations, measured drawings, and surveys of regional house types, this handbook provides a working vocabulary for the study and appreciation of America¹s common houses and will prove useful to preservationists, academics, and architects, as well as owners and residents of America¹s most ubiquitous residences. "--$cProvided by publisher.
520 $a"Hubka argues that even "vernacular architecture" scholars tend to embrace a model for understanding home forms that relies on iconic architects and theories about how ideas proceed downward from aesthetic ideals to home construction, even though this model fails to adequately characterize the vast majority actual homes that people live in, particularly in recent times after the widespread growth of suburban America. This controversial book proposes new ways to categorize houses"--$cProvided by publisher.
505 0 $aHouses without Names: The Problem of Interpreting America's Common Houses -- Underlying Themes for Understanding Common Houses -- Emphasizing the Floor Plan in Common Houses -- Identifying the Floor Plan from the Outside -- Houses with Names: Interpreting America's Common Houses.
650 0 $aArchitecture, Domestic$zUnited States$xClassification.
650 0 $aVernacular architecture$zUnited States$xClassification.
650 0 $aArchitecture and society$zUnited States.
650 7 $aARCHITECTURE / Buildings / Residential.$2bisacsh
650 7 $aHISTORY / United States / General.$2bisacsh