MARC Record from Library of Congress

LEADER: 05030cam a2200325 a 4500
001 2013409781
003 DLC
005 20131022080956.0
008 130626s2012 gw a b 001 0 eng d
010 $a 2013409781
016 7 $a016221795$2Uk
020 $a9783110216202
020 $a3110216205
020 $z9783110216219 (e-ISBN)
020 $z3110216213 (e-ISBN)
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn820811497
040 $aQGK$beng$cQGK$dQGK$dUKMGB$dQGK$dNUI$dOCLCO$dYDXCP$dCDX$dOHX$dOUN$dSTF$dBWX$dDLC
042 $alccopycat
050 00 $aP118$b.J67 2012
072 7 $aP$2lcco
082 04 $a401.93
100 1 $aJordens, Peter.
245 10 $aLanguage acquisition and the functional category system /$cPeter Jordens.
260 $aBerlin ;$aBoston :$bMouton de Gruyter,$cc2012.
300 $axii, 279 p. :$bill. ;$c24 cm.
490 1 $aSOLA Studies on language acquisition,$x1861-4248 ;$v39
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [271]-276) and index.
505 00 $gIntroduction.$gLanguage acquisition from a functional perspective ;$gOverview of the book --$tLexical vs. functional elements ;$tStructure in language ;$tLanguage structure in production;$tPhrase structure:$tLexical selection:$tPhrasal coherence;$tUtterance structure:$tPerspective taking:$tContextual embedding:$tLexical categories:$tFunctional categories;$tWord formation:$tDerivation, inherent and contextual inflection:$tLexical and functional categories of word formation ;$tLearner systems;$tUtterance structure at the initial stage;$tWord formation at the initial stage ;$tFirst and second language acquisition ;$tResearch questions ;$tData sources --$tThe target system.$gIntroduction ;$tUtterance structure;$tBasic word order;$tWord order variation;$tInformation structure and lexical meaning:$tVP structure:$tFP structure:$tThe function of F:$tMovement;$tSummary ;$tUtterance production;$tConceptualization, lexicalization and predication:$tConceptualization:$tLexicalization:$tPredication;$tExpressing finiteness and contextual embedding:$tThe semantic function of finiteness :$tTruth value:$tAnchoring :$tTemporal anchoring :$tSpatial anchoring:$tThe function of SpecFP;$tSummary ;$tHypotheses on language development --$tThe initial state.$tFiniteness at the initial state ;$tTheoretical accounts;$tMorpho-syntactic systems:$tPoeppel and Wexler (1993), Wexler (1998):$tDiscussion;$tSemantic systems:$tClahsen (1986):$tDiscussion:$tIngram and Thompson (1996):$tDiscussion;$tSummary ;$tThe alternative ;$tSummary --$tThe lexical stage.$tBasic languages, research questions ;$tThe analysis of early learner data ;$tUtterance structure at the lexical stage;$tLexical projections;$tTesting the model : ergativesand particle verbs:$tErgatives:$tParticle verbs;$tWord order:$tSubject first:$tTopic first;$tHead-initial;$tSummary ;$tConflicting constraints ;$tConclusion ;$tFrom the lexical stage to the functional stage --$tThe functional stage.$tThe acquisition of the projection of F;$tUtterance structure at the lexical stage;$tTowards a functional topic position;$tTowards a grammatical subject position ;$tEvidence of the projection of F;$tThe functional topic position;$tThe functional category F:$tAnalysis of the modal expressions 'ulle', 'mag-ikke' and 'nee':$tAnalysis of the unanalysed modal expressions:$tEpistemic modals:$tThe auxiliary verbs 'heb, heeft' and 'ben, is':$tThe auxiliary verbs 'doe, doef and 'ga, gaat';$tTopicalization ;$tThe topic position;$tThe affix in F as a topicalization device;$tYes/no- and wh-questions;$tVerb-third in adult L2 ;$tFiniteness;$tAuxiliary verbs:$tVerb placement:$t'Light verbs':$tMorphological properties of finiteness in L2 Dutch;$tGrammatical aspect;$tTense;$tAgreement ;$tSummary --$tFiniteness in language acquisition research.$tFiniteness in first language research;$tL1 Dutch : Gillis (2003);$tL1 German : Bittner (2003);$tSummary ;$tFiniteness in second language research;$tVerb placement and inflectional morphology:$tThe contingency between verb placement and morphology:$tMethodological questions:$tVerb placement and inflectional morphology in second language research;$tRestrictions on the contingency between verb placement and inflection:$tParodi (1998, 2000);$tThe dissociation of verb placement and inflection : the impaired representation Hypothesis:$tMeisel (1997);$tThe separation of verb placement and inflection : the missing surface inflection Hypothesis:$tPré́vost and white (2000);$tThe acquisition of auxiliaries as a prerequisite for verb movement;$tThe stagewise acquisition of the functional category system:$tRule and Marsden (2006):$tVainikka and Young-Scholten (1996, 2011) : The organic grammar approach:$tBecker (2005);$tSummary:$tThe contingency between verb placement and morphology:$tThe acquisition of the auxiliary as a carrier of finiteness --$tConclusion.$tBasic languages ;$tThe lexical stage ;$tThe functional stage ;$tDriving forces --$gReferences --$gIndex.
650 0 $aLanguage acquisition.
830 0 $aStudies on language acquisition ;$v39.