| Record ID | marc_loc_updates/v36.i33.records.utf8:15316476:1757 |
| Source | Library of Congress |
| Download Link | /show-records/marc_loc_updates/v36.i33.records.utf8:15316476:1757?format=raw |
LEADER: 01757nam a22002777a 4500
001 2008610876
003 DLC
005 20080813065810.0
007 cr |||||||||||
008 080710s2008 mau sb 000 0 eng
010 $a 2008610876
040 $aDLC$cDLC
050 00 $aHB1
100 1 $aAnderson, James E.
245 10 $aConsistent trade policy aggregation$h[electronic resource] /$cJames E. Anderson.
260 $aCambridge, MA :$bNational Bureau of Economic Research,$cc2008.
490 1 $aNBER working paper series ;$vworking paper 14046
538 $aSystem requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader.
538 $aMode of access: World Wide Web.
500 $aTitle from PDF file as viewed on 7/10/2008.
530 $aAlso available in print.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references.
520 3 $a"Most empirical policy work requires the aggregation of policies. Trade policy aggregation exemplifies the aggregation problem poignantly, with thousands of highly dispersed trade barriers. This paper provides methods of policy aggregation that are consistent with two common objectives of empirical work. One is to preserve real income. The other is to preserve the real volume of activity in the parts of the economy being aggregated. Both objectives must be achieved for consistent multi-country policy modeling. An application to India shows that the standard atheoretic method of aggregation overstates India's real income by around 3 times the global gains from free trade"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.
710 2 $aNational Bureau of Economic Research.
830 0 $aWorking paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research : Online) ;$vworking paper no. 14046.
856 40 $uhttp://papers.nber.org/papers/w14046