Record ID | marc_loc_updates/v40.i19.records.utf8:7839164:3317 |
Source | Library of Congress |
Download Link | /show-records/marc_loc_updates/v40.i19.records.utf8:7839164:3317?format=raw |
LEADER: 03317cam a2200445 a 4500
001 2011278117
003 DLC
005 20120502113858.0
008 120416s2012 enk b 001 0 eng d
010 $a 2011278117
015 $aGBB196591$2bnb
016 7 $a015868982$2Uk
020 $a9780567554680 (hbk.)
020 $a0567554686 (hbk.)
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn751750982
040 $aUKMGB$beng$cUKMGB$dDTM$dITC$dYDXCP$dBTCTA$dBDX$dDEBSZ$dBWX$dDLC
042 $alccopycat
050 00 $aBS2575.52$b.T43 2012
082 04 $a226.206$223
100 1 $aTheophilos, Michael,$d1979-
245 14 $aThe abomination of desolation in Matthew 24.15 /$cMichael P. Theophilos.
260 $aLondon ;$aNew York, NY :$bT & T Clark,$cc2012.
300 $avi, 285 p. ;$c25 cm.
490 1 $aLibrary of New Testament studies ;$v437
490 1 $aT & T Clark library of biblical studies
500 $a"A Continuum imprint"--T.p. verso.
500 $aOriginally presented as the author's thesis (D. Phil.)--University of Oxford, 2008.
520 $a"Michael P. Theophilos investigates the term 'Abomination of desolation' in Matthew 24.15, proposing a revised model for understanding this enigmatic phrase. He adopts a contextual exegetical approach focusing strongly upon scriptural intertextual prophetic echoes. Because of the primary association of the phrase with Antiochus Epiphanes in the Daniel narrative, many commentators have argued for a non-Jewish referent in regard to the background to Mt 24.15. However, analysis of relevant prophetic literature reveals that similar vocabulary was often used to describe Israel's covenantal infidelity and its consequences. Given the influence of prophetic literature on Daniel, Theophilos argues that Matthew was theologically motivated to ironically employ the Danielic material in describing Jerusalem's destruction. Theophilos suggests that Matthew envisions the cause for this destruction as rooted in Israel's rejection of Jesus as Messiah. In this sense, the coming 'Son of Man' in Matthew 24 may be seen as a metaphorical representation of the Roman Army destroying Jerusalem in 70 AD. This understanding of 'Son of Man' is consistent with the Danielic depiction where the appearance of the 'Son of Man' signified the destruction of Israel's enemies"--Provided by publisher.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [231]-257) and indexes.
505 00 $tIntroduction : assumptions and dating --$tScholarship on the [to bdelygma tēs erēmōseōs] --$tStructure and significance --$t"Eschatological" and "apocalyptic" language in Matthew 24 --$tDaniel and intertextual prophetic texts --$tImplications, summary, and conclusions.
630 00 $aBible.$pN.T.$pMatthew XXIV, 15$xCriticism, interpretation, etc.
630 00 $aBible$xProphecies$xEnd of the world.
630 00 $aBible.$pO.T.$pDaniel$xRelation to Matthew.
630 00 $aBible.$pN.T.$pMatthew$xRelation to Daniel.
610 20 $aTemple of Jerusalem (Jerusalem)
600 00 $aJesus Christ$xMessiahship.
650 0 $aIntertextuality in the Bible.
830 0 $aLibrary of New Testament studies ;$v437.
830 0 $aT & T Clark library of biblical studies.
856 4 $mDE-576;DE-21$qapplication/pdf$uhttp://swbplus.bsz-bw.de/bsz348109733inh.htm$v20120216095100$3Inhaltsverzeichnis