It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from Marygrove College

Record ID marc_marygrove/marygrovecollegelibrary.full.D20191108.T213022.internetarchive2nd_REPACK.mrc:130671259:3248
Source Marygrove College
Download Link /show-records/marc_marygrove/marygrovecollegelibrary.full.D20191108.T213022.internetarchive2nd_REPACK.mrc:130671259:3248?format=raw

LEADER: 03248cam a2200673 a 4500
001 ocm38989667
003 OCoLC
005 20191109071506.8
008 980414s1998 enka b 001 0 eng
010 $a 98011836
040 $aDLC$beng$cDLC$dUKM$dUKV3G$dBAKER$dBTCTA$dYDXCP$dOCLCG$dOCLCA$dOCLNG$dGEBAY$dILU$dBDX$dOCLCO$dOCLCF$dOCLCQ$dECB$dOCL$dOCLCQ$dERR$dOCLCO$dCNGUL$dOCL$dFNL
015 $aGB9959142$2bnb
019 $a60133704
020 $a0415185467$q(pbk.)
020 $a9780415185462$q(pbk.)
020 $a0415185459$q(hbk.)
020 $a9780415185455$q(hbk.)
029 1 $aAU@$b000013840191
029 1 $aAU@$b000053327964
029 1 $aGEBAY$b5905073
029 1 $aNZ1$b2310272
029 1 $aYDXCP$b1486437
029 1 $aYDXCP$b1486438
035 $a(OCoLC)38989667$z(OCoLC)60133704
050 00 $aK230.F842$bS8 1998
082 00 $a340/.1$221
084 $aB565.5$2clc
049 $aMAIN
100 1 $aSuber, Peter.
245 14 $aThe case of the speluncean explorers :$bnine new opinions /$cPeter Suber.
260 $aLondon ;$aNew York :$bRoutledge,$c1998.
300 $axii, 111 pages :$billustrations ;$c24 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 00 $gpt. I.$tLon Fuller's Case of the Speluncean Explorers.$tOpinion of Chief Justice Truepenny.$tOpinion of Justice Foster.$tOpinion of Justice Tatting.$tOpinion of Justice Keen.$tOpinion of Justice Handy.$tOpinion of Justice Tatting.$tPostscript --$gpt. II.$tNine New Opinions.$tOpinion of Chief Justice Burnham.$tOpinion of Justice Springham.$tOpinion of Justice Tally.$tOpinion of Justice Hellen.$tOpinion of Justice Trumpet.$tOpinion of Justice Goad.$tOpinion of Justice Frank.$tOpinion of Justice Reckon.$tOpinion of Justice Bond.
520 $aLon L. Fuller published his "The Case of the Speluncean Explorers" in 1949 (Harvard Law Review, vol. 62, no. 4), an invented legal case with opinions by "supreme court judges" meant to reflect differing legal philosophies. It is reprinted here, with nine new opinions by Peter Suber.
590 $bInternet Archive - 2
590 $bInternet Archive 2
600 10 $aFuller, Lon L.$q(Lon Luvois),$d1902-1978.
600 14 $aFuller, Lon L.,$d1902-$xContributions in law.
600 17 $aFuller, Lon L.$xContributions in law.$2cct
600 17 $aFuller, Lon L.$q(Lon Luvois),$d1902-1978$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01717050
600 17 $aFuller, Lon L.$2swd
650 0 $aLaw$xPhilosophy.
650 7 $aLaw$xPhilosophy.$2cct
650 7 $aLaw$xPhilosophy.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00993788
650 7 $aRechtsphilosophie$2gnd
655 0 $aLaw.
856 42 $3Publisher description$uhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0649/98011836-d.html
938 $aBaker & Taylor$bBKTY$c125.00$d125.00$i0415185459$n0003172526$sactive
938 $aBaker & Taylor$bBKTY$c39.95$d39.95$i0415185467$n0003156159$sactive
938 $aBrodart$bBROD$n52463338$c$27.95
938 $aBaker and Taylor$bBTCP$n98011836
938 $aTaylor & Francis$bTYFR$n0415185467
938 $aYBP Library Services$bYANK$n1486438
994 $a92$bERR
976 $a31927002070347