MARC Record from Miami University of Ohio

LEADER: 03962cam 22003614a 4500
001 ocm45059077
005 20040423084830.0
008 000918s2003 caua b 000 0 eng
010 $a00045817
020 $a0833029177
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dOCLCQ$dC#P$dXY4
042 $apcc
043 $an-us---
049 $aMIAA
050 00 $aUA23$b.F883 2003
245 00 $aFuture roles of U.S. nuclear forces :$bimplications for U.S. strategy /$cGlenn C. Buchan ... [et al.]
246 3 $aFuture roles of United States nuclear forces
260 $aSanta Monica, CA :$bRand Project Air Force,$c2003
300 $axxiv, 128 p. :$bill. ;$c23 cm
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 121-128)
500 $a"Prepared for the United States Air Force."
500 $a"MR-1231-AF"--P. [4] of cover
520 $aSince the end of the Cold War, the U.S. has reexamined its basic assumptions about foreign policy and instruments of national security policy. This study examines the possible roles of nuclear weapons in contemporary U.S. national security policy
505 0 $aIntroduction -- Nuclear weapons and U.S. security, back to basics: What nuclear weapons do -- Risks and disadvantages of nuclear weapons -- Historical legacy -- Contemporary roles for U.S. nuclear weapons: New security environment -- Future nuclear threats -- Other kinds of threats -- U.S. national security policy; a spectrum of possibilities -- Abstinence -- Defense -- Counterforce and countermilitary operations -- Deterrence and coercion -- Potential roles for U.S. nuclear weapons -- Terror weapons/traditional deterrence -- Counterforce -- Special targets -- Critical military situations -- Stressing cases; some contemporary comparisons between nuclear and conventional weapons: Strategic nuclear weapons in halting invading armies -- Halting an army; nuclear weapons -- Halting an army; smart/brilliant weapons -- Halting an army; collateral damage possibilities -- Halting an army; pros and cons of nuclear versus conventional weapons -- Strategic nuclear weapons in destroying hardened bunkers containing WMD -- Destroying bunkers; nuclear weapons -- Destroying bunkers; conventional precision-guided weapons -- Destroying bunkers; advantages and disadvantages of nuclear and conventional weapons -- Destroying bunkers; "new" weapons? -- Strategic nuclear weapons in destroying a deeply buried command and control facility -- Destroying deeply buried facilities; earth-penetrating conventional weapons -- Destroying deeply buried facilities; nuclear weapons -- Destroying deeply buried facilities; collateral damage -- Destroying deeply buried facilities; nuclear versus conventional weapons for functionally kills -- Role of nuclear weapons in defense against ballistic missiles -- Missile defense; nuclear weapon performance -- Nuclear threat -- Biological threat -- Missile defense; collateral damage -- Missile defense; nuclear delivery options -- Comparison; the four scenario classes -- Implications for future U.S. nuclear strategy: Spectrum of nuclear strategic options -- Abolition -- Aggressive reductions and "dealerting" -- "Business as usual, only smaller" -- More aggressive nuclear posture -- Nuclear emphasis -- Some additional comments on deterrence by threat of punishment -- Maintaining a robust nuclear deterrent -- Flexible use of nuclear forces -- Characteristics of nuclear weapon systems -- Exploiting asymmetries -- Nuclear proliferation -- Is "withering away" inevitable? -- Conclusions
650 0 $aStrategic forces$zUnited States
651 0 $aUnited States$xMilitary policy
650 0 $aNuclear weapons$zUnited States
700 1 $aBuchan, Glenn C
710 1 $aUnited States.$bAir Force
830 0 $aMR (Rand Corporation) ;$vMR-1231-AF
907 $a.b31061837$b04-23-04$c04-23-04
998 $akngl$b04-23-04$cm$da$e-$feng$gcau$h0$i1
945 $g1$i35054027951314$j0$lkngli$o-$p$0.00$q $r $s-$t0$u3$v2$w0$x0$y.i41152050$z04-23-04