MARC Record from marc_nuls

LEADER: 11786nam 2200349Ia 4500
001 9920858360001661
005 20150423132038.0
008 131013s2006 ne 00 0 eng d
020 $a9067042218 (hbk. )
024 3 $a9789067042215 (hbk. )
035 $a(CSdNU)u286366-01national_inst
035 $a(OCoLC)70239551
035 $a(OCoLC)70239551
040 $aEQO$cEQO$dBAKER$dNLGGC$dOrLoB-B
049 $aCNUM
050 14 $aHV6773 $b .C91 2006
245 00 $aCybercrime and jurisdiction : $b a global survey / $c edited by Bert-Jaap Koops and Susan W. Brenner; contributions by Susan W. Brenner ... [et al.].
260 $aThe Hague :$b TMC Asser Press,$c c2006.
300 $axvii, 355 p. ;$c25 cm.
440 0 $aInformation technology & law series ;$v11
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references.
505 0 $a1. Cybercrime Jurisdiction - an Introduction / Bert-Jaap Koops and Susan W. Brenner -- 1.1. Substantive and Procedural Cybercrime Jurisdiction -- 1.2. Traditional Bases for Jurisdiction -- 1.3. Diverging Views -- 1.4. Aim and Structure of This Book -- 2. Jurisdiction in the Cybercrime Convention / Henrik W.K. Kaspersen -- 2.1. Introductory Remarks -- 2.2. Jurisdiction Rules in the Cybercrime Convention -- 2.2.1. Territoriality principle -- 2.2.2. Ubiquitous nature of cybercrimes -- 2.2.3. Substantial link -- 2.3. Other Jurisdiction Principles -- 2.3.1. High seas and outer space -- 2.3.2. Nationality principle -- 2.3.3. Universality principle -- 2.4. Rights of the Defendant -- 2.5. International Law: a Matter of Pragmatism? -- 2.5.1. Extradition -- 2.5.2. International co-ordination -- 2.6. Positive Jurisdiction Conflicts and the Need for Flexibility -- 2.7. Obligation to Prosecute? -- 2.8. Jurisdiction Principles and Extraterritorial Criminal Investigations -- 2.9. Concluding Observations -- 3. International Co-operation as a Promise and a Threat / Gus Hosein -- 3.1. Questioning International Co-operation -- 3.2. Traversing a History of Jurisdiction -- 3.2.1. 'New bottles': Everything is different -- 3.2.2. 'Old wine': Nothing new -- 3.3. Reaching for Harmonization: International Co-operation in Criminal Matters -- 3.3.1. Co-operation as a response to terrorism -- 3.3.2. Case: Maher Arar and the international co-operation in intelligence -- 3.4. Harmonization and International Co-operation Involving Information Technology -- 3.4.1. Co-operation as a necessity for cybercrime -- 3.4.2. Case: Investigating Indymedia -- 3.5. Can International Co-operation Be Regulated? -- 4. Cybercrime and Jurisdiction in Australia / Gregor Urbas and Peter Grabosky -- 4.1. Introduction -- 4.2. National Cybercrime Legislation -- 4.2.1. Jurisdictional overview -- 4.2.2. Historical overview of computer-crime laws -- 4.2.3. Specific cybercrime provisions -- 4.2.4. Relevant case law -- 4.3. Legal Provisions on Jurisdiction for Cybercrimes -- 4.3.1. Commonwealth legislation -- 4.3.2. State and territory legislation -- 4.4. Co-operation Arrangements -- 4.5. Cross-Border Investigation -- 4.6. Conclusion -- 5. Cybercrime and Jurisdiction in Belgium and the Netherlands. Lotus in Cyberspace - Whose Sovereignty Is at Stake? / Paul de Hert -- 5.1. Introduction -- 5.2. 'Sovereignty', 'Jurisdiction', an 'Territoriality' -- 5.3. Cybercrime Legislation: Old and New -- 5.3.1. The strength of existing criminal-law instruments -- 5.3.2. Deconstruction of the threat analysis at the national level -- 5.3.3. Cross-border investigation powers -- 5.4. International Co-operation and the European Arrest Warrant -- 5.4.1. Today's possibilities -- 5.4.2. The 2002 framework decision on the European arrest warrant -- 5.4.3. Implications of the EAW for cybercrime -- 5.4.4. Illustration: the case of Holocaust denier Siegfried Verbeke -- 5.5. Enlarged Jurisdiction -- 5.5.1. Territoriality and Belgian and Dutch jurisdiction provisions -- 5.5.2. Two developments with regard to enlarged jurisdiction -- 5.6. Jurisdiction and the Flexibility of International Law -- 5.6.1. The Lotus case -- 5.6.2. Yerodia does not correct Lotus but proves my point -- 5.7. Extraterritorial Investigation? -- 5.7.1. Lotus and the legality of extraterritorial law enforcement -- 5.7.2. The legality of transborder access to stored computer data -- 5.8. Conclusion -- 6. Cybercrime and Jurisdiction in Brazil. From Extraterritorial to Ultraterritorial Jurisdiction? / Roberto Chacon de Albuquerque -- 6.1. Introduction -- 6.2. Cybercrime Legislation -- 6.2.1. Substantive law -- 6.2.2. Procedural law -- 6.3. Cross-Border Cyber-Investigation -- 6.4. Substantive Cybercrime Jurisdiction -- 6.5. Extraterritorial Jurisdiction and Jurisdiction Conflicts -- 6.6. Pitfalls of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction -- 6.7. Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in Brazil -- 6.7.1. Unconditional extraterritorial jurisdiction -- 6.7.2. Conditional extraterritorial jurisdiction -- 6.8. Ultraterritorial Jurisdiction -- 6.9. Conclusion -- 7. Cybercrime and Jurisdiction in Chile / Rodrigo Zuniga and Fernando Londono -- 7.1. Introduction -- 7.2. Brief Legislative History -- 7.2.1. Material provisions -- 7.2.2. Procedural provisions -- 7.3. Material Provisions on Relevant Cybercrimes -- 7.3.1. Provisions within the law -- 7.3.2. Relevant case law -- 7.4. Procedural Provisions Applicable to Cybercrime Investigations -- 7.5. Material Jurisdiction -- 7.5.1. Legal provisions on jurisdiction concerning cybercrimes -- 7.5.2. The reasonableness of claiming jurisdiction for cybercrimes -- 7.6. Procedural Jurisdiction -- 7.7. Conclusion -- 8. Cybercrime and Jurisdiction in Denmark / Henrik Spang-Hanssen -- 8.1. Introduction -- 8.2. Substantive Cybercrime Legislation -- 8.2.1. General issues -- 8.2.2. Provisions relating to cybercrimes -- 8.3. Procedural Provisions -- 8.3.1. Investigation powers -- 8.3.2. International co-operation -- 8.3.3. Co-operation with EU countries -- 8.3.4. Co-operation with the Nordic countries -- 8.4. Jurisdiction Concerning Cybercrime -- 8.5. Analysis and Opinion -- 8.5.1. What is a cybercrime? -- 8.5.2. Cybercrime jurisdiction and public international law -- 8.5.3. Cyber-investigation jurisdiction -- 8.5.4. Conflict in cybercrime jurisdiction -- 8.6. Conclusion -- 9. Cybercrime and Jurisdiction in Germany. The Present Situation and the Need for New Solutions / Ulrich Sieber -- 9.1. Introduction -- 9.1.1. The new challenges of cybercrime -- 9.1.2. The new responses of the international community -- 9.1.3. The situation in Germany -- 9.1.4. The need for new solutions in the field of jurisdiction -- 9.2. Traditional Approaches in German Criminal Law -- 9.2.1. The need for differentiation -- 9.2.2. The traditional approaches to action crimes and abstract endangerment offenses -- 9.3. New Solutions -- 9.3.1. The autonomous interpretation of the concept of result -- 9.3.2. Dissemination of illegal content: distinction between push and pull -- 9.3.3. The BGH decision in the Toben case -- 9.4. Results and Consequences -- 9.4.1. Result with respect to present law -- 9.4.2. Evaluation of the present legal situation -- 9.4.3. Basic principles for the future development of jurisdiction in cyberspace -- 9.4.4. Conclusions for legal policy -- 10. Cybercrime and Jurisdiction in India / Pavan Duggal -- 10.1. Introducton -- 10.2. Indian Cybercrime Legislation -- 10.2.1. Substantive law -- 10.2.2. Procedural law -- 10.3. Cybercrime Jurisdiction -- 10.3.1. Legal provisions -- 10.3.2. Jurisprudence -- 10.4. Evidentiary Issues -- 10.5. Analysis and Opinion -- 10.6. Conclusion -- 11. Cybercrime and Jurisdiction in Italy / Giovanni Ziccardi -- 11.1. Substantive Cybercrime Law -- 11.1.1. The Constitution of 1948 -- 11.1.2. The first real informatic provisions -- 11.1.3. Copyright law -- 11.1.4. The Italian Computer Crimes Act of 1993 -- 11.1.5. The Data Protection Acts of 1996 and 2003 -- 11.2. Procedural Cybercrime Law -- 11.2.1. Network wiretapping -- 11.2.2. Search, seizure, and network searches -- 11.2.3. Data retention -- 11.3. Jurisdiction: The Applicability of Italian Criminal Law -- 11.3.1. The Locus Commissi Delicti Issue -- 11.3.2. The obligatory nature of Italian criminal law -- 11.3.3. The principle of territoriality -- 11.3.4. Applicability of the principle of territoriality -- 11.3.5. Applicability of the principle of defense -- 11.4. A Typical Case: An Attack from 'Outside' -- 11.5. Conclusion -- 12. Cybercrime and Jurisdiction in Japan / Pauline C. Reich -- 12.1. Introduction -- 12.2. Cybercrime Legislation -- 12.2.1. Substantive law -- 12.2.2. Procedural law -- 12.2.3. Japan and the Cybercrime Convention -- 12.3. Jurisdiction in Cybercrime Cases -- 12.3.1. Jurisdictional provisions -- 12.3.2. Case law on cross-border cybercrime -- 12.3.3. Cyber-investigation and international co-operation -- 12.4. Conclusion -- 13. Cybercrime and Jurisdiction in the Republic of Korea / Jeong-Hoon Lee -- 13.1. Introduction -- 13.2. Substantive Cybercrime Legislation -- 13.2.1. The Criminal Act -- 13.2.2. The Information and Communications Network Act.
505 8 $a13.3. Criminal Jurisdiction over Cybercrime -- 13.3.1. Principles of criminal jurisdiction -- 13.3.2. Application of the principles of criminal jurisdiction -- 13.4. Evidence and International Mutual Assistance Concerning Cybercrime -- 13.4.1. Investigation of evidence -- 13.4.2. Search and seizure -- 13.4.3. Admissibility of evidence -- 13.4.4. International mutual assistance -- 13.5. Conclusion -- 14. Cybercrime and Jurisdiction in New Zealand / Noel Cox -- 14.1. Introduction -- 14.2. National Cybercrime Legislation -- 14.2.1. Brief history -- 14.2.2. Provisions on various cybercrimes -- 14.2.3. Investigation powers -- 14.3. Jurisdiction for Cybercrimes -- 14.3.1. Provisions in law -- 14.3.2. Case law -- 14.4. Policy Considerations -- 14.4.1. Claiming jurisdiction for cybercrimes -- 14.4.2. Dealing with cyber-investigation jurisdiction -- 14.4.3. Positive and negative jurisdiction conflicts -- 14.5. Conclusion -- 15. Cybercrime and Jurisdiction in the United Kingdom / Ian Walden -- 15.1. Introduction -- 15.2. Material Jurisdiction -- 15.2.1. Statutory rules -- 15.2.2. Extraterritorial criminal law -- 15.3. Procedural Jurisdiction -- 15.3.1. Investigating cybercrime -- 15.3.2. Moving evidence -- 15.3.3. Moving people -- 15.4. Concluding Remarks -- 16. Cybercrime and Jurisdiction in the United States / Jessica R. Herrera-Flanigan -- 16.1. Introduction -- 16.2. Cybercrime Substantive Laws -- 16.2.1. Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986 -- 16.2.2. Other relevant laws -- 16.3. Cybercrime Procedural Laws -- 16.4. United States Determination of Jurisdiction -- 16.5. United States Determination of Venue, Once Jurisdiction is Established -- 16.6. Jurisdictional Issues with Cybercrime Investigations -- 16.6.1. Ivanov-Gorshkov, McKinnon, and Zezev cases -- 16.6.2. Procedures for searching computers internationality and providing assistance -- 16.7. Conclusion -- 17. The Next Step: Prioritizing Jurisdiction / Susan W. Brenner -- 17.1. Jurisdictional Conflicts -- 17.2. Prioritizing Jurisdictional Claims: Lack of Guidance -- 17.3. Factors in Prioritizing Jurisdictional Claims -- 17.3.1. Place of commission of the crime -- 17.3.2. Custody of the perpetrator -- 17.3.3. Harm -- 17.3.4. Nationality -- 17.3.5. Strength of the case against the perpetrator -- 17.3.6. Punishment -- 17.3.7. Fairness and convenience -- 17.4. Conclusion.
650 0 $aComputer crimes$xPrevention.
650 0 $aJurisdiction.
650 0 $aInternet$xLaw and legislation.
700 1 $aKoops, Bert-Jaap.
700 1 $aBrenner, Susan W.
947 $fSOBM-CJ$hCIRCSTACKS$p$81.70$q1
949 $i31786102310742
994 $a92$bCNU
999 $aHV 6773 .C91 2006$wLC$c1$i31786102310742$d10/23/2008$e10/4/2008 $lCIRCSTACKS$mNULS$n2$q1$rY$sY$tBOOK$u11/15/2006