MARC Record from marc_nuls

LEADER: 03410cam 2200505 i 4500
001 9925254594601661
005 20170103044426.0
008 150826s2016 cau b 001 0 eng c
010 $a 2015033514
019 $a933271703
020 $a9780804796064$q(cloth : alk. paper)
020 $a0804796068
020 $a9780804798006$q(pbk. : alk. paper)
020 $a0804798001
020 $z9780804798013$q(electronic)
035 $a99970054707
035 $a(OCoLC)920551966$z(OCoLC)933271703
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn920551966
040 $aCSt/DLC$beng$erda$cSTF$dDLC$dOCLCF$dYDXCP$dNLGGC$dBDX$dBTCTA$dGWL$dCDX$dUCILW$dDAC$dMUU
042 $apcc
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aKF4772$b.B38 2016
082 00 $a342.7308/53$223
100 1 $aBatchis, Wayne,$d1974-$eauthor.
245 14 $aThe right's First Amendment :$bthe politics of free speech & the return of conservative libertarianism /$cWayne Batchis.
246 30 $aPolitics of free speech, and the return of conservative libertarianism
264 1 $aStanford, California :$bStanford Law Books, an imprint of Stanford University Press,$c[2016]
300 $axiv, 281 pages ;$c24 cm.
336 $atext$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aStanford studies in law and politics
505 0 $aIntroduction : the right's First Amendment -- Conservatism, the First Amendment, and National Review -- The political science of judicial decision making -- Political correctness and the rise of the conservative victim -- The courts and the political correctness indictment -- The rise of free-market conservatism -- Commercial speech in the modern era -- Citizens United and the paradox of associational speech.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 231-269) and index.
520 $a"Not so long ago, being aggressively "pro-free speech" was as closely associated with American political liberalism. But with little notice, this political dynamic has been shaken to the core. The Right's First Amendment examines how conservatives came to adopt, and co-opt, constitutional expressive rights. Free speech on college campuses in the 1960s was seen as a guarantee for social agitators and hippies--but today, for many conservatives, it represents instead a crucial shield protecting unfashionable traditionalists from a perceived scourge of political correctness and liberal oversensitivity. Does this shift represent a genuine and principled change in conservative philosophy, or merely a results-oriented strategy? What do these changes mean for the future of First Amendment interpretation? Wayne Batchis explores these questions by surveying six decades of the conservative publication National Review. Presented alongside evolving constitutional law, Batchis reveals how this keystone of American civics now carries a much more complex and nuanced political identity."--Back cover.
610 10 $aUnited States.$tConstitution.$n1st Amendment.
650 0 $aFreedom of speech$zUnited States.
650 0 $aPolitical correctness$zUnited States.
650 0 $aConstitutional law$zUnited States.
650 0 $aJudicial process$zUnited States.
650 0 $aConservatism$zUnited States.
650 0 $aLibertarianism$zUnited States.
830 0 $aStanford studies in law and politics.
947 $hCIRCSTACKS$r31786103051816
980 $a99970054707