| Record ID | marc_nuls/NULS_PHC_180925.mrc:227664182:1927 |
| Source | marc_nuls |
| Download Link | /show-records/marc_nuls/NULS_PHC_180925.mrc:227664182:1927?format=raw |
LEADER: 01927cam 22003974a 4500
001 9921312140001661
005 20150423134144.0
008 060105s2006 ksu b s001 0 eng
010 $a 2006000286
020 $a0700614400 (cloth : alk. paper)
020 $a0700614419 (pbk. : alk. paper)
035 $a(CSdNU)u276052-01national_inst
035 $a(OCoLC)62858050
035 $a(OCoLC)62858050
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dBAKER$dC#P
042 $apcc
043 $an-us---
049 $aCNUM
050 00 $aKF224.M213$bL66 2006
082 00 $a345.730522$222
100 1 $aLong, Carolyn Nestor.
245 10 $aMapp v. Ohio :$bguarding against unreasonable searches and seizures / $cCarolyn N. Long.
246 3 $aMapp versus Ohio
260 $aLawrence, Kan. :$bUniversity Press of Kansas,$cc2006.
300 $axii, 228 p. ;$c23 cm.
440 0 $aLandmark law cases & American society
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 209-219) and index.
505 0 $aThe Ohio battle -- The history of the Fourth Amendment and the federal exclusionary rule -- One final appeal -- The Supreme Court deliberates -- Mapp goes public -- Is the criminal to go free because the constable has blundered? -- The Warren court's criminal procedure revolution and the political aftermath -- The judicial and political effort to undermine Mapp v. Ohio and the future of the exclusionary rule.
600 10 $aMapp, Dollree$xTrials, litigation, etc.
650 0 $aSearches and seizures$zUnited States.
650 0 $aExclusionary rule (Evidence)$zUnited States.
938 $aBaker & Taylor$bBKTY$c35.00$d35.00$i0700614400$n0006650098$sactive
938 $aBaker & Taylor$bBKTY$c15.95$d15.95$i0700614419$n0006650099$sactive
949 $aKF 224.M213 L66 2006$i31786102085294
994 $a92$bCNU
999 $aKF 224 .M213 L66 2006$wLC$c1$i31786102085294$d2/28/2012$e2/21/2012 $lCIRCSTACKS$mNULS$n5$rY$sY$tBOOK$u6/13/2006