| Record ID | marc_nuls/NULS_PHC_180925.mrc:256132850:1823 |
| Source | marc_nuls |
| Download Link | /show-records/marc_nuls/NULS_PHC_180925.mrc:256132850:1823?format=raw |
LEADER: 01823cam 22003734a 4500
001 9919217170001661
005 20150423114726.0
008 050915s2006 maua b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2005026948
020 $a1405113049 (hbk. : alk. paper)
020 $a1405113057 (pbk. : alk. paper)
024 3 $a9781405113045
024 3 $a9781405113052
035 $a(CSdNU)u277505-01national_inst
035 $a(OCoLC)61684157
035 $a(OCoLC)61684157
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dBAKER$dBWKUK
042 $apcc
049 $aCNUM
050 00 $aBF311$b.C659 2006
082 00 $a153$222
245 00 $aContemporary debates in cognitive science /$cedited by Robert J. Stainton.
260 $aMalden, MA ;$aOxford :$bBlackwell Pub.,$c2006.
300 $axiv, 339 p. :$bill. ;$c26 cm.
440 0 $aContemporary debates in philosophy ;$v7
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 $aJust how modular is the mind? -- How much knowledge of language is innate? -- Has cognitive science shown that human beings are cognitively bounded, or irrational? -- Are rules and representations necessary to explain systematicity? -- Can consciousness and qualia be reduced? -- Does cognitive science need external content at all? -- Is the aim of perception to provide accurate representations? -- Can mental states, knowledge in particular, be divided into a narrow component and a broad component?
650 0 $aCognitive science$xPhilosophy.
700 1 $aStainton, Robert.
938 $aBaker & Taylor$bBKTY$c84.95$d.00$i1405113049$n0006456490$sactive
938 $aBaker & Taylor$bBKTY$c34.95$d.00$i1405113057$n0006596466$sactive
949 $aBF 311 .C659 2006$i31786102282123
994 $a92$bCNU
999 $aBF 311 .C659 2006$wLC$c1$i31786102282123$lCIRCSTACKS$mNULS$rY$sY $tBOOK$u6/27/2006