It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from marc_nuls

Record ID marc_nuls/NULS_PHC_180925.mrc:60241401:2725
Source marc_nuls
Download Link /show-records/marc_nuls/NULS_PHC_180925.mrc:60241401:2725?format=raw

LEADER: 02725cam 2200445Ka 4500
001 9920730240001661
005 20150423131343.0
008 080218s2008 nyua b 001 0 eng d
020 $a0802714889 :$c$26.00
020 $a9780802714886
035 $a(CSdNU)u336344-01national_inst
035 $a(OCoLC)192082386
035 $a(OCoLC)192082386
035 $a(OCoLC)192082386
040 $aBTCTA$cBTCTA$dBAKER$dYDXCP$dBKL$dBUR$dWIQ$dTEF
043 $an-us---
049 $aCNUM
050 04 $aKF4575$b.G65 2008
082 04 $a347.012/0973$222
100 1 $aGoldstone, Lawrence,$d1947-
245 14 $aThe activist :$bJohn Marshall, Marbury v. Madison, and the myth of judicial review /$cLawrence Goldstone.
250 $a1st U.S. ed.
260 $aNew York :$bWalker & Co,$c2008.
300 $aviii, 294 p. :$bill. ;$c25 cm.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [259]-283) and index.
520 $aAmong the many momentous decisions rendered by the Supreme Court, none has had a greater impact than that passed down in 1803 by Chief Justice John Marshall in the case of Marbury v. Madison. While the ruling itself was innocuous, its implications were enormous, for Marshall had, in essence, claimed for the Supreme Court the right to determine what the Constitution really means, known formally as the principle of "judicial review." Yet, as author Goldstone shows, that right is nowhere expressed in the Constitution. Goldstone brings to life the debates at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 over the structure of our judicial system, and introduces in brief the life and ambition of John Marshall, and the early, fragile years of the Supreme Court. Marshall made the Court supreme, and ironically, while judicial review has been used sparingly, without it the Court would likely never have intervened in the 2000 presidential election.--From publisher description.
600 10 $aMarshall, John,$d1755-1835.
600 10 $aMarbury, William,$d1761 or 1762-1835$xTrials, litigation, etc.
600 10 $aMadison, James,$d1751-1836$xTrials, litigation, etc.
610 10 $aUnited States.$bSupreme Court$xHistory.
610 10 $aUnited States.$bConstitutional Convention$d(1787)
650 0 $aJudicial review$zUnited States$xHistory.
650 0 $aSeparation of powers$zUnited States$xHistory.
938 $aBaker and Taylor$bBTCP$nBK0007630630
938 $aBaker & Taylor$bBKTY$c26.00$d19.50$i0802714889$n0007630630$sactive
938 $aYBP Library Services$bYANK$n2835423
947 $fCOLS-LAW$hCIRCSTACKS$p$22.36$q1
949 $aKF 4575 .G65 2008$i31786102453658
994 $a92$bCNU
999 $aKF 4575 .G65 2008$wLC$c1$i31786102453658$lCIRCSTACKS$mNULS$rY$sY $tBOOK$u11/13/2008