MARC Record from marc_nuls

LEADER: 04296cam 2200373 i 4500
001 9925241707601661
005 20151218054230.4
008 141120s2015 ksu b 001 0deng
010 $a 2014045937
020 $a9780700620777$q(hbk. ;$qalk. paper)
020 $a070062077X$q(cloth ;$qalk. paper)
020 $z9780700620784$q(ebook)
020 $z0700620788$q(ebook)
035 $a99968270758
035 $a(OCoLC)895730900
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn895730900
040 $aDLC$beng$erda$cDLC$dYDX$dBTCTA$dBDX$dOCLCF$dZXQ$dCDX$dCLU$dYDXCP$dGYG$dOCL$dOCLCQ
042 $apcc
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aKF220$b.F75 2015
082 00 $a347.73/709$223
100 1 $aFriedman, Lawrence M.$q(Lawrence Meir),$d1930-$eauthor.
245 14 $aThe big trial :$blaw as public spectacle /$cLawrence M. Friedman.
264 1 $aLawrence, Kansas :$bUniversity Press of Kansas,$c[2015]
300 $a225 pages ;$c23 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 173-210) and index.
505 0 $aLaw and its audience -- Open to the public : the headline trial -- Political trials -- Corruption and fraud -- Was justice done? -- Tabloid trials -- Celebrity trials -- Mystery and identity -- The worm in the bud -- The reason why -- Who are we : identity and the headline trial -- Enter the media -- Instant celebrity -- A concluding word.
520 $aThe trial of O.J. Simpson was a sensation, avidly followed by millions of people, but it was also, in a sense, nothing new. One hundred years earlier the Lizzie Borden trial had held the nation in thrall. The names (and the crimes) may change, but the appeal is enduring - and why this is, how it works, and what it means are what Lawrence Friedman investigates in The Big Trial. What is it about these cases that captures the public imagination? Are the "headline trials" of our period different from those of a century or two ago? And what do we learn from them, about the nature of our society, past and present? To get a clearer picture, Friedman first identifies what certain headline trials have in common, then considers particular cases within each grouping. The political trial, for instance, embraces treason and spying, dissenters and radicals, and, to varying degrees, corruption and fraud. Celebrity trials involve the famous - whether victims, as in the case of Charles Manson, or defendants as disparate as Fatty Arburkle and William Kennedy Smith - but certain high-profile cases, such as those Friedman categorizes as tabloid trials, can also create celebrities. The fascination of whodunit trials can be found in the mystery surrounding the case: Are we sure about O.J. Simpson? What about Claus von Bulow - tried, in another sensational case, for sending his wife into a coma? An especially interesting type of case Friedman groups under the rubric worm in the bud. These are cases, such as that of Lizzie Borden, that seem to put society itself on trial: they raise fundamental social questions and often suggest hidden and secret pathologies. And finally, a small but important group of cases proceed from moral panic, the Salem witchcraft trials being the classic instance, though Friedman also considers recent examples. Though they might differ in significant ways, these types of trials also have important similarities. Most notably, they invariably raise questions about identity (Who is this defendant? A villain? An innocent unfairly accused?). And in this respect, The Big Trial shows us, the headline trial reflects a critical aspect of modern society. Reaching across the nineteenth and twentieth centuries to the latest outrage, from congressional hearings to lynching and vigilante justice to public punishment, from Dr. Sam Sheppard (the "fugitive") to Jeffrey Dahmer (the "cannibal"), The Rosenbergs to Timonthy McVeigh, the book presents a complex picture of headline trials as displays of power - moments of "didactic theater" that demonstrate in one way or another whether a society is fair, whom is protects, and whose interests it serves. -- from back cover.
650 0 $aTrials$zUnited States$xHistory.
947 $hCIRCSTACKS$r31786103034903
980 $a99968270758