It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from marc_oapen

Record ID marc_oapen/convert_oapen_20201117.mrc:12792001:2863
Source marc_oapen
Download Link /show-records/marc_oapen/convert_oapen_20201117.mrc:12792001:2863?format=raw

LEADER: 02863namaa2200301uu 450
001 http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/25526
005 20190326
020 $aP3.0095.1.00
024 7 $a10.21983/P3.0095.1.00$cdoi
041 0 $aEnglish
042 $adc
072 7 $aAMA$2bicssc
100 1 $aLambert, Léopold$4edt
700 1 $aLambert, Léopold$4oth
245 10 $aThe Funambulist Pamphlets 11: Cinema
260 $aBrooklyn, NY$bpunctum books$c2015
300 $a1 electronic resource (110 p.)
506 0 $aOpen Access$2star$fUnrestricted online access
520 $aThe Funambulist Pamphlets is a series of small books archiving articles published on The Funambulist, collected according to specific themes. These volumes propose a different articulation of texts than the usual chronological one. The eleven volumes are respectively dedicated to Spinoza, Foucault, Deleuze, Legal Theory, Occupy Wall Street, Palestine, Cruel Designs, Arakawa + Madeline Gins, Science Fiction, Literature, and Cinema. Volume 11 is devoted to the topic of Cinema: Spike Lee, Béla Tarr, Michelangelo Antonioni and the many other filmmakers named in this volume do not seem to have much in common at first sight; nevertheless, considered through the interpretation of a Spinozist materialist philosophy, their films might have something to say to one another. Take the mud of Red Desert (Antonioni), the volcanic slopes of The Bad Sleep Well (Kurosawa) and the soil of Pina Bausch’s Rite of Spring magnified in Pina (Wenders), for example. What these material manifestations have in common is that they are all in relation with bodies, themselves assemblages of moving matter. Similarly, consider Spike Lee’s dolly shot, Orson Welles’s labyrinth, Béla Tarr’s entropy, and Peter Watkins’s democratic improvisations: they all manifest the power of immanence and its inexorability. These films involve no deus ex machina; everything in them comes ‘from the ground’ in a continuous refusal of a celestial or other form of transcendence. Developing this kind of reading of these films allows us to avoid a traditional chronological reading of history of cinema in favor of another, one more dedicated to the philosophical vision of the world that cinema triggers
540 $aCreative Commons$fhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/$2cc$4https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
546 $aEnglish
650 7 $aTheory of architecture$2bicssc
653 $aarchitecture
653 $acinema
653 $adesign
653 $acultural studies
856 40 $awww.oapen.org$uhttps://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/33c296f0-4f6b-416b-bd03-79a8397d0377/1004569.pdf$70$zOAPEN Library: download the publication
856 40 $awww.oapen.org$uhttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/25526$70$zOAPEN Library: description of the publication