It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from marc_oapen

Record ID marc_oapen/convert_oapen_20201117.mrc:28483310:2939
Source marc_oapen
Download Link /show-records/marc_oapen/convert_oapen_20201117.mrc:28483310:2939?format=raw

LEADER: 02939namaa2200385uu 450
001 http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/32715
005 20161231
041 0 $aEnglish
042 $adc
072 7 $aJHB$2bicssc
072 7 $aJHMC$2bicssc
100 1 $aPilkington, Hilary$4auth
245 10 $aLoud and proud: Passion and politics in the English Defence League
260 $bManchester University Press$c2016
300 $a1 electronic resource (328 p.)
506 0 $aOpen Access$2star$fUnrestricted online access
520 $aThe book uses interviews, informal conversations and extended observation at EDL events to critically reflect on the gap between the movement's public image and activists' own understandings of it. It details how activists construct the EDL, and themselves, as 'not racist, not violent, just no longer silent' inter alia through the exclusion of Muslims as a possible object of racism on the grounds that they are a religiously not racially defined group. In contrast activists perceive themselves to be 'second-class citizens', disadvantaged and discriminated by a 'two-tier' justice system that privileges the rights of 'others'. This failure to recognise themselves as a privileged white majority explains why ostensibly intimidating EDL street demonstrations marked by racist chanting and nationalistic flag waving are understood by activists as standing 'loud and proud'; the only way of 'being heard' in a political system governed by a politics of silencing. Unlike most studies of 'far right' movements, this book focuses not on the EDL as an organisation - its origins, ideology, strategic repertoire and effectiveness - but on the individuals who constitute the movement. Its ethnographic approach challenges stereotypes and allows insight into the emotional as well as political dimension of activism. At the same time, the book recognises and discusses the complex political and ethical issues of conducting close-up social research with 'distasteful' groups.
536 $aUniversity of Manchester
540 $aCreative Commons$fhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/$2cc$4https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
546 $aEnglish
650 7 $aSociology$2bicssc
650 7 $aSocial & cultural anthropology, ethnography$2bicssc
653 $aislamophobia
653 $apopulist radical right movements
653 $apolitical activism
653 $asocial movements
653 $afar right organisations
653 $aenglish defence league
653 $aethnography
653 $aMulticulturalism
653 $aMuslims
653 $aRacism
653 $aWhite people
856 40 $awww.oapen.org$uhttps://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/697c13eb-b693-432d-8c34-b87c5c670899/607920.pdf$70$zOAPEN Library: download the publication
856 40 $awww.oapen.org$uhttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/32715$70$zOAPEN Library: description of the publication