It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from marc_oapen

Record ID marc_oapen/convert_oapen_20201117.mrc:5129281:3829
Source marc_oapen
Download Link /show-records/marc_oapen/convert_oapen_20201117.mrc:5129281:3829?format=raw

LEADER: 03829namaa2200361uu 450
001 http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/33680
005 20131112
020 $aOAPEN_459391
024 7 $a10.26530/OAPEN_459391$cdoi
041 0 $aEnglish
042 $adc
072 7 $aHR$2bicssc
072 7 $aHRA$2bicssc
100 1 $aBurns Coleman, Elizabeth$4auth
700 1 $aSuzette Fernandes-Dias, Maria$4auth
245 10 $aNegotiating the Sacred II : Blasphemy and Sacrilege in the Arts
260 $aCanberra$bANU Press$c2008
300 $a1 electronic resource (210 p.)
506 0 $aOpen Access$2star$fUnrestricted online access
520 $aBlasphemy and other forms of blatant disrespect to religious beliefs have the capacity to create significant civil and even international unrest. Consequently, the sacrosanctity of religious dogmas and beliefs, stringent laws of repression and codes of moral and ethical propriety have compelled artists to live and create with occupational hazards like uncertain audience response, self-censorship and accusations of deliberate misinterpretation of cultural production looming over their heads. Yet, in recent years, issues surrounding the rights of minority cultures to recognition and respect have raised new questions about the contemporariness of the construct of blasphemy and sacrilege. Controversies over the aesthetic representation of the sacred, the exhibition of the sacred as art, and the public display of sacrilegious or blasphemous works have given rise to heated debates and have invited us to reflect on binaries like artistic and religious sensibilities, tolerance and philistinism, the sacred and the profane, deification and vilification. Endeavouring to move beyond ‘simplistic’ points about the rights to freedom of expression and sacrosanctity, this collection explores how differences between conceptions of the sacred can be negotiated. It recognises that blasphemy may be justified as a form of political criticism, as well as a sincere expression of spirituality. But it also recognises that within a pluralistic society, blasphemy in the arts can do an enormous amount of harm, as it may also impair relations within and between societies.

This collection evolved out a two-day conference called ‘Negotiating the Sacred: Blasphemy and Sacrilege in the Arts’ held at the Centre for Cross Cultural Research at The Australian National University in November 2005. This is the second volume in a series of five conferences and edited collections on the theme ‘Negotiating the Sacred’. The first conference, ‘Negotiating the Sacred: Blasphemy and Sacrilege in a Multicultural Society’ was held at The Australian National University’s Centre for Cross-Cultural Research in 2004, and published as an edited collection by ANU E Press in 2006. Other conferences in the series have included Religion, Medicine and the Body (ANU, 2006), Tolerance, Education and the Curriculum (ANU, 2007), and Governing the Family (Monash University, 2008). Together, the series represents a major contribution to ongoing debates on the political demands arising from religious pluralism in multicultural societies.

540 $aAll rights reserved$4http://oapen.org/content/about-rights
546 $aEnglish
650 7 $aReligion & beliefs$2bicssc
650 7 $aReligion: general$2bicssc
653 $aoffenses against religion
653 $asociology
653 $areligion
653 $asacrilege
653 $aarts
653 $ablasphemy
653 $aGod
856 40 $awww.oapen.org$uhttps://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/6975d1ce-5165-426d-9d22-c4c6acb6e395/459391.pdf$70$zOAPEN Library: download the publication
856 40 $awww.oapen.org$uhttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/33680$70$zOAPEN Library: description of the publication