Record ID | marc_oapen/convert_oapen_20201117.mrc:9995310:2899 |
Source | marc_oapen |
Download Link | /show-records/marc_oapen/convert_oapen_20201117.mrc:9995310:2899?format=raw |
LEADER: 02899namaa2200421uu 450
001 http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/24053
005 20191121
020 $a9780203991084
020 $a9780748402601;9781135747558;9781135747541;9781135747503
024 7 $a10.4324/9780203991084$cdoi
041 0 $aEnglish
042 $adc
072 7 $aH$2bicssc
072 7 $aJHB$2bicssc
100 1 $aGroot, Gertjan De$4edt
700 1 $aSchrover, Marlou$4edt
700 1 $aGroot, Gertjan De$4oth
700 1 $aSchrover, Marlou$4oth
245 10 $aWomen Workers And Technological Change In Europe In The Nineteenth And twentieth century
260 $bTaylor & Francis$c1995
506 0 $aOpen Access$2star$fUnrestricted online access
520 $aFrom the traditional stereotyped viewpoint, femininity and technology clash. This negative association between women and technology is one of the features of the sex-typing of jobs. Men are seen as technically competent and creative; women are seen as incompetent, suited only to work with machines that have been made and maintained by men. Men identify themselves with technology, and technology is identified with masculinity. The relationship between technology, technological change and women's work is, however, very complex.; Through studies examining technological change and the sexual division of labour, this book traces the origins of the segregation between women's work and men's work and sheds light on the complicated relationship between work and technology. Drawing on research from a number of European countries England, Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands, international contributors present detailed studies on women's work spanning two centuries. The chapters deal with a variety of work environments - office work, textiles and pottery, food production, civil service and cotton and wool industries.; This work rejects the idea that women were mainly employed as unskilled labour in the industrial revolutions, asserting that skill was required from the women, but that both the historical record about women's work and the social construction of the concept of "skill" have denied this.
540 $aCreative Commons$fhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/$2cc$4https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
546 $aEnglish
650 7 $aHumanities$2bicssc
650 7 $aSociology$2bicssc
653 $agender
653 $adivision
653 $aclay
653 $aend
653 $aspinning
653 $amill
653 $awomens
653 $aself-acting
653 $amule
653 $acotton
856 40 $awww.oapen.org$uhttps://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/c1575651-dbd5-445a-8814-7614b0e5fd2b/1006079.pdf$70$zOAPEN Library: download the publication
856 40 $awww.oapen.org$uhttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/24053$70$zOAPEN Library: description of the publication