Record ID | marc_oapen/oapen.marc.utf8.mrc:8939001:2974 |
Source | marc_oapen |
Download Link | /show-records/marc_oapen/oapen.marc.utf8.mrc:8939001:2974?format=raw |
LEADER: 02974 am a22003973u 450
001 1000322
005 20181003
007 cu#uuu---auuuu
008 181003s|||| xx o 0 u eng |
020 $a9780198820932
024 7 $a10.1093/oso/9780198820932.001.0001$2doi
041 0 $aeng
042 $adc
072 7 $aR$2bicssc
100 1 $aBebbington, Anthony$4aut
245 10 $aGoverning Extractive Industries
260 $aOxford, UK$bOxford University Press$c2018
300 $a304
520 $aProposals for more effective natural resource governance emphasize the importance of institutions and governance, but say less about the political conditions under which institutional change occurs. This book synthesizes findings regarding the political drivers of institutional change in extractive industry governance. The authors analyse resource governance from the late nineteenth century to the present in Bolivia, Ghana, Peru, and Zambia. They focus on the ways in which resource governance and national political settlements interact. Special attention is paid to the nature of elite politics, the emergence of new political actors, forms of political contention, changing ideas regarding natural resources and development, the geography of natural resource deposits, and the influence of the transnational political economy of global commodity production. National elites and subnational actors are in continuous contention over extractive industry governance. Resource rents are used by elites to manage this contention and incorporate actors into governing coalitions and overall political settlements. Periodically, new resource frontiers are opened, and new political actors emerge with the power to redefine how extractive industries are governed and used as instruments for development. Colonial and post-colonial histories of resource extraction continue to give political valence to ideas of resource nationalism that mobilize actors who challenge existing institutional arrangements. The book is innovative in its focus on the political longue durée, and the use of in-depth, comparative, country-level analysis in Africa and Latin America, to build a theoretical argument that accounts for both similarity and divergence between these regions.
546 $aEnglish.
650 7 $aEarth sciences, geography, environment, planning$2bicssc
653 $amining
653 $aextractive industry
653 $anatural resource governance
653 $apolitical settlements
653 $aBolivia
653 $aGhana
653 $aPeru
653 $aZambia
653 $ainclusive development
700 1 $aAbdulai, Abdul-Gafaru$4aut
700 1 $aHumphreys Bebbington, Denise$4aut
700 1 $aHinfelaar, Marja$4aut
700 1 $aSanborn, Cynthia$4aut
856 40 $uhttp://www.oapen.org/download?type=document&docid=1000322$zAccess full text online
856 40 $uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/$zCreative Commons License