MARC Record from marc_openlibraries_sanfranciscopubliclibrary

LEADER: 04300cam a2200625 a 4500
001 496282188
003 OCoLC
005 20151005084019.0
008 091231s2010 mau b 001 0 eng
010 $a2009052779
015 $aGBB078036$2bnb
016 7 $a015588796$2Uk
020 $a9780262014472
020 $a0262014475
035 $a496282188
035 $a(OCoLC)496282188
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dYDXCP$dUKM$dC#P$dCDX$dLHU$dSFR$dUtOrBLW
042 $apcc
049 $aSFRA
050 00 $aAE100$b.R43 2010
082 00 $a030$222
092 $a030$bR228g
100 1 $aReagle, Joseph Michael.
245 10 $aGood faith collaboration :$bthe culture of Wikipedia /$cJoseph Michael Reagle Jr. ; foreword by Lawrence Lessig.
260 $aCambridge, Mass. :$bMIT Press,$cc2010.
300 $axv, 244 p. ;$c24 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aHistory and foundations of information science
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [175]-234) and index.
505 0 $aNazis and norms -- The pursuit of the universal encyclopedia -- Good faith collaboration -- The puzzle of openness -- The challenges of consensus -- The benevolent dictator -- Encyclopedic anxiety -- Conclusion : a globe in accord.
520 $aWikipedia, the online encyclopedia, is built by a community - a community of Wikipedians who are expected to "assume good faith" when interacting with one another. In Good Faith Collaboration, Joseph Reagle examines this unique collaborative culture.
520 $aWikipedia, says Reagle, is not the first effort to create a freely shared, universal encyclopedia; its early twentieth-century ancestors include Paul Otlet's Universal Repository and H. G. Wells's proposal for a World Brain. Both these projects, like Wikipedia, were fuelled by new technology-which at the time included index cards and microfilm. What distinguishes Wikipedia from these and other more recent ventures is Wikipedia's good faith collaborative culture, as seen not only in the writing and editing of articles but also in their discussion pages and edit histories. Keeping an open perspective on both knowledge claims and other contributors, Reagle argues, creates an extraordinary collaborative potential.
520 $aWikipedia is famously an encyclopedia "anyone can edit," and Reagle examines Wikipedia's openness and several challenges to it: technical features that limit vandalism to articles; private actions to mitigate potential legal problems; and Wikipedia's own internal bureaucratization. He explores Wikipedia's process of consensus (reviewing a dispute over naming articles on television shows) and examines the way leadership and authority work in an open content community.
520 $aWikipedia's style of collaborative production has been imitated, analyzed, and satirized. Despite the social unease over its implications for individual autonomy, institutional authority, and the character (and quality) of cultural products, Wikipedia's good faith collaborative culture has brought us closer than ever to a realization of the century-old pursuit of a universal encyclopedia."--BOOK JACKET.
630 00 $aWikipedia.
650 0 $aElectronic encyclopedias$vCase studies.
650 0 $aWikis (Computer science)$vCase studies.
650 0 $aCommunication in learning and scholarship$xTechnological innovations$vCase studies.
650 0 $aAuthorship$xCollaboration$vCase studies.
650 0 $aOnline social networks$vCase studies.
830 0 $aHistory and foundations of information science.
907 $a.b2395663x$b11-14-18$c02-02-11
998 $axgc$b04-26-11$cm$da $e-$feng$gmau$h0$i0
957 00 $aOCLC reclamation of 2017-18
907 $a.b2395663x$b04-27-15$c02-02-11
938 $aYBP Library Services$bYANK$n3305894
938 $aCoutts Information Services$bCOUT$n11545991
956 $aPre-reclamation 001 value: ocn496282188
980 $a0411 KL
998 $axgc$b04-26-11$cm$da$e-$feng$gmau$h0$i0
994 $aC0$bSFR
999 $yMARS
945 $a030$bR228g$d - - $e10-06-2018 17:45$f0$g0$h10-27-18$i31223094389898$j503$0501$k - - $lxgcci$o-$p$28.00$q-$r-$s- $t0$u12$v12$w1$x1$y.i64671963$z05-31-11