It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from marc_openlibraries_sanfranciscopubliclibrary

Record ID marc_openlibraries_sanfranciscopubliclibrary/sfpl_chq_2018_12_24_run05.mrc:110421412:4017
Source marc_openlibraries_sanfranciscopubliclibrary
Download Link /show-records/marc_openlibraries_sanfranciscopubliclibrary/sfpl_chq_2018_12_24_run05.mrc:110421412:4017?format=raw

LEADER: 04017cam a22005418i 4500
001 ocn869437532
003 OCoLC
005 20151005123525.0
008 140505s2014 nyu b 001 0 eng
010 $a2014017851
015 $aGBB4C6496$2bnb
016 7 $a016939604$2Uk
020 $a9781137279231 (hardback)
020 $a1137279230 (hardback)
035 $a(OCoLC)869437532
037 $bSt Martins Pr, C/O Mps 16365 James Madison Hwy Us Hwy 15, Gordonsville, VA, USA, 22942, (212)6745151$nSAN 631-5011
040 $aDLC$beng$erda$cDLC$dYDXCP$dBTCTA$dBDX$dOCLCF$dBKL$dUKMGB$dYCC$dGZL$dSFR$dUtOrBLW
042 $apcc
043 $an-us---
049 $aSFRA
050 00 $aKF8742$b.R655 2014
082 00 $a347.73/26$223
092 $a347.7326$bR678o
100 1 $aRoot, Damon,$eauthor.
245 10 $aOverruled :$bthe long war for control of the U.S. Supreme Court /$cDamon Root.
264 1 $aNew York, NY :$bPalgrave Macmillan,$c2014.
300 $a274 pages ;$c25 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
505 0 $aIntroduction : The Long War -- "The Right of Free Labor" -- The Devil and Oliver Wendell Holmes -- "Robert Bork's America" -- Libertarians vs. Conservatives -- Litigating for Liberty -- Guns, Lawyers, and Butchers -- Obamacare on Trial -- Epilogue : No Peace.
520 $a"Can the federal government make you eat your fruits and vegetables? Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan seemed to think so when asked if she thought Congress possessed the constitutional power to force every American to "eat three fruits and three vegetables every day." Kagan laughed and said that while it sounded like "a dumb law," that did not make it an unconstitutional one. In other words, if you don't like what your lawmakers have done, take your complaint to the ballot box, not to the courthouse. It was a classic case of judicial restraint, the idea that judges should defer to the will of the majority and refrain from striking down most democratically-enacted laws, even the really dumb ones. Judicial restraint and judicial activism cut across the political spectrum in surprising ways and make for some unusual bedfellows. Judicial restraint is not only a touchstone of the Progressive left, it is also a philosophy adopted by many members of the modern right. The growing camp of libertarians and free-market conservatives, however, has no patience with judicial restraint and little use for majority rule. Chief Justice Roberts' 2012 ruling in favor of Obama's health care law is an excellent case in point, though only the most recent. This is the story of two competing visions, each one with its own take on what role the government and the courts should play in our society, a fundamental debate that goes to the very heart of our constitutional system"--$cProvided by publisher.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages [261]-264) and index.
610 10 $aUnited States.$bSupreme Court.
650 0 $aPolitical questions and judicial power$zUnited States.
856 42 $3Cover image$uhttp://www.netread.com/jcusers2/bk1388/231/9781137279231/image/lgcover.9781137279231.jpg
907 $a.b2929325x$b09-14-17$c10-22-14
998 $axgi$b12-19-14$cm$da $e-$feng$gnyu$h0$i0
907 $a.b2929325x$b01-22-15$c10-22-14
938 $aYBP Library Services$bYANK$n11608713
938 $aBaker and Taylor$bBTCP$nBK0014391900
938 $aBrodart$bBROD$n108627225
980 $a1214 sh emd
998 $axgi$b12-19-14$cm$da$e-$feng$gnyu$h0$i0
994 $aC0$bSFR
999 $yMARS
945 $a347.7326$bR678o$d - - $e01-26-2015 10:47$f0$g0$h03-04-15$i31223108687485$j171$0323$k - - $lxgici$nGIC Inventory 2016$o-$p$28.00$q-$r-$s- $t0$u1$v1$w0$x0$y.i8029358x$z01-16-15
945 $a347.7326$bR678o$d - - $e02-23-2016 17:25$f0$g0$h03-20-16$i31223108687493$j191$0800$k - - $lxgici$nGIC Inventory 2016$o-$p$28.00$q-$r-$s- $t0$u3$v2$w0$x0$y.i80293591$z01-16-15