MARC Record from marc_openlibraries_sanfranciscopubliclibrary

LEADER: 03369cam a2200553 i 4500
001 ocn862098455
003 OCoLC
005 20151005122727.0
008 131202s2014 ctu b 001 0 eng
010 $a2013047823
015 $aGBB461463$2bnb
016 7 $a016741952$2Uk
020 $a9780300191899 (hardback)
020 $a0300191898 (hardback)
035 $a(OCoLC)862098455
037 $bYale Univ Pr, C/O Triliteral Llc 100 Maple Ridge Dr, Cumberland, RI, USA, 02864-1769, (401)6584226$nSAN 631-8126
040 $aDLC$erda$beng$cDLC$dYDX$dBTCTA$dBDX$dYDXCP$dRCJ$dUKMGB$dOCLCF$dCDX$dSFR$dUtOrBLW
042 $apcc
043 $an-us---
049 $aSFRA
050 00 $aKF540$b.S58 2014
082 00 $a346.7301/7$223
092 $a346.017$bSh925c
100 1 $aShulman, Jeffrey,$d1951-$eauthor.
245 14 $aThe constitutional parent :$brights, responsibilities, and the enfranchisement of the child /$cJeffrey Shulman.
264 1 $aNew Haven [Connecticut] :$bYale University Press,$c[2014]
300 $ax, 345 pages ;$c25 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 00 $tSacred trust or sacred right? --$tParenting as a sacred trust --$tParenting as a sacred right --$tToward constitutional parenthood --$gConclusion:$tThe world all before them.
520 $a"In this bold and timely work, law professor Jeffrey Shulman argues that the United States Constitution does not protect a fundamental right to parent. Based on a rigorous reconsideration of the historical record, Shulman challenges the notion, held by academics and the general public alike, that parental rights have a long-standing legal pedigree. What is deeply rooted in our legal tradition and social conscience, Shulman demonstrates, is the idea that the state entrusts parents with custody of the child, and it does so only as long as parents meet their fiduciary duty to serve the developmental needs of the child. Shulman's illuminating account of American legal history is of more than academic interest. If once again we treat parenting as a delegated responsibility-as a sacred trust, not a sacred right-we will not all reach the same legal prescriptions, but we might be more willing to consider how time-honored principles of family law can effectively accommodate the evolving interests of parent, child, and state"--$cProvided by publisher.
650 0 $aParent and child (Law)$zUnited States.
650 0 $aChildren$xLegal status, laws, etc.$zUnited States.
650 0 $aDomestic relations$zUnited States.
650 0 $aConstitutional law$zUnited States.
907 $a.b2913531x$b09-14-17$c08-27-14
998 $axgi$b10-16-14$cm$da $e-$feng$gctu$h4$i0
907 $a.b2913531x$b08-20-15$c08-27-14
938 $aBaker and Taylor$bBTCP$nBK0013976300
938 $aBrodart$bBROD$n107711559
938 $aYBP Library Services$bYANK$n11317199
938 $aCoutts Information Services$bCOUT$n26586291
980 $a1014 sh
998 $axgi$b10-16-14$cm$da$e-$feng$gctu$h4$i0
994 $aC0$bSFR
999 $yMARS
945 $a346.017$bSh925c$d - - $e - - $f0$g0$h02-02-18$i31223107490493$j503$0501$k - - $lxgici$nGIC Inventory 2017$o-$p$40.00$q-$r-$s- $t0$u5$v2$w0$x2$y.i79363064$z10-27-14