THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG WOMEN'S HEALTH BELIEFS REGARDING BREAST SELF-EXAMINATION, THEIR EXPLANATORY STYLE FOR POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EVENTS, AND BREAST SELF-EXAMINATION FREQUENCY.

  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read
THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG WOMEN'S HEALTH BELIEF ...
Catherine Gale Stern, Catherin ...
Not in Library

My Reading Lists:

Create a new list

Check-In

×Close
Add an optional check-in date. Check-in dates are used to track yearly reading goals.
Today

  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

Buy this book

Last edited by Open Library Bot
December 3, 2010 | History

THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG WOMEN'S HEALTH BELIEFS REGARDING BREAST SELF-EXAMINATION, THEIR EXPLANATORY STYLE FOR POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EVENTS, AND BREAST SELF-EXAMINATION FREQUENCY.

  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

Three theoretical frameworks provided a rationale for this study. The Health Belief Model (HBM) (Becker, 1974) was employed to predict relationships among six constructs, perceived susceptibility, seriousness, benefits, barriers, control, and health motivation, which were defined in relation to breast-self examination (BSE) by (Champion, 1984; 1985; 1987). Two attributional theories were also used: an attributional framework of achievement motivation (Weiner, 1980; 1983; 1985) and the reformulated learned helplessness theory (Abramson et al., 1978; Peterson & Seligman, 1984) for positive and negative event perceptions, respectively.

It was hypothesized that the six interactive, multiplicative constructs (HBM-BSE Model), and explanatory style dimensions for positive and negative events (internal/external, stable/unstable, and global/specific) would significantly discriminate two groups: non-to-low (N-LP) and regular, monthly (RP) BSE practicers (p =.05).

The revised Champion Health Belief Model Scale (CHBMS) (Champion, 1987), the Attributional Style Questionnaire (ASQ) (Peterson et al., 1982), and a Personal Data Sheet were administered to a convenience sample of 126 Caucasian Jewish women. From this group, a sample representing the two BSE practice groups was used (n = 81).

Discriminant analysis revealed that none of the hypotheses were supported (p $>$.05). Classification results showed 69.05% were "grouped" correctly by the HBM-BSE model, while such results for positive and negative explanatory style were no better than chance.

When tested individually, ANOVA revealed a statistically significant mean difference for the perceived barriers construct in the N-LP BSE group when compared with the RP and monthly plus (M+) BSE groups (p $<$.001). ANOVA also showed that women who reported never having had a breast disease perceived significantly more benefits (p =.05) and performed BSE significantly more frequently than those who have/had breast disease (chi-square =.008). Thirteen women who had a negative explanatory style practiced BSE more frequently, i.e., from two to six times per week.

Qualitative analysis of women's verbatim responses regarding greater than monthly BSE practice indicated the presence of benign breast disease was the major reason. Descriptive data of selected breast cancer risk factors/behaviors were presented. Recommendations for further research were discussed.

Publish Date
Pages
241

Buy this book

Book Details


Edition Notes

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 50-04, Section: B, page: 1327.

Thesis (PH.D.)--ADELPHI UNIVERSITY, 1989.

School code: 0001.

The Physical Object

Pagination
241 p.
Number of pages
241

ID Numbers

Open Library
OL17870559M

Community Reviews (0)

Feedback?
No community reviews have been submitted for this work.

Lists

This work does not appear on any lists.

History

Download catalog record: RDF / JSON
December 3, 2010 Edited by Open Library Bot Added subjects from MARC records.
January 22, 2010 Edited by WorkBot add more information to works
December 11, 2009 Created by WorkBot add works page